Roll Call! Senate Rejects Local Control Over Siting of Solar Generation Plants (8-21), 2014

Roll Call Rotator
SENATE REJECTS LOCAL CONTROL OVER
SITING OF SOLAR GENERATION PLANTS
.

FAILED

in the State Senate on March 19, 2014 by a vote of

8-21

Purpose: S.191 would have required that ground mounted solar generation plants “comply with setback and screening requirements adopted by the municipality” in which the project would be built. It would also have allowed local communities more input into how and where solar plants are located. (Read the Bill)

Analysis:  Those voting NO on S.191 oppose any obstacles to the growth of renewable power generation in Vermont and feel that requiring deference to local input during the process of permitting solar plants might, in the words of Sen. David Zuckerman (D/P-Chittenden), “create hurdles for renewable energy progress.” (VT Digger) By rejecting this bill, they empower the Public Service Board (an unelected body) to disregard or override local zoning regulations.

Those voting YES on S.191 would have required the Public Service Board to respect local zoning and screening bylaws when siting solar projects.

Senate Journal, Wednesday, March 19, 2014. “Thereupon, third reading of the bill was disagreed to on a roll call, Yeas 8, Nays 21.” (Read the Journal, p.444-446)

Related Material:
What Going to 90% Renewables Would Do To Vermont’s Landscape, by Meredith Angwin.


How They Voted

(Click on Your Senator’s Name to Send an Email)

Timothy Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) – NO
Claire Ayer (D-Addison) – NO
Philip Baruth (D-Chittenden) – NO
Joseph Benning (R-Caledonia) – YES
Christopher Bray (D-Addison) – NO
John Campbell (D-Windsor) – PRESIDING
Donald Collins (D-Franklin) – NO
Ann Cummings (D-Washington) – NO
William Doyle (R-Washington) – NO
Margaret Flory (R-Rutland) – NO
Eldred French (D-Rutland) – NO
Peter Galbraith (D-Windham) – YES
Robert Hartwell (D-Bennington) – YES
M. Jane Kitchel (D-Caledonia) – YES
Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden) – NO
Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) – NO
Richard Mazza (D-Chittenden-Grand Isle) – NO
Norman McAllister (R-Franklin) – NO
Richard McCormack (D-Windsor) – NO
Kevin Mullin (R-Rutland) – YES
Alice Nitka (D-Windsor District) – NO
Anthony Pollina (P/D/W-Washington) – NO
John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) – YES
Richard Sears (D-Bennington) – NO
Diane Snelling (R-Chittenden) – YES
Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) – YES
Michael Sirotkin (D-Chittenden) – NO
Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) – NO
Jeanette White (D-Windham) – NO
David Zuckerman (P-Chittenden) – NO

Not yet signed up? Join the EAI email list today.

 

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Olivia de Havilland, RIP

July 31, 2020 By John McClaughry Olivia de Havilland died last week at the age of 104. She was remembered by most  for her role as Melanie in Gone...

Covid Is the Iceberg that Sinks the Public School System

July 31, 2020 by Rob Roper Covid 19 is going to change how many things are done around the world even long after it’s gone, and some for...

The Government that Cried ‘Mask Mandate’

July 30, 2020 By David Flemming As Governor Scott’s mask mandate looms on August 1, a popular question many Vermonters are asking is “how strictly will it be...

VT Left Wing Media Bias Unmasks Itself

July 24, 2020 By Rob Roper Dave Gram was a long time reporter for the Associated Press, is currently the host of what’s billed on WDEV as a...

Using Guns for Self Defense – 3 Recent Examples

July 24, 2020 By John McClaughry  The Heritage Foundation’s Daily Signal last week published eleven news stories about citizens using a firearm to stop a crime. Here are...

Video