What Do New Committee Assignments Say About a Carbon Tax?

by Rob Roper

The Carbon Tax Warriors in the Vermont State House aren’t going away (at least not the ones who weren’t voted out last November). The latest trumpet call to battle came from Rep. Molly Burke (D-Brattleboro) in a WKVT interview (around the 22 minute mark) in which she promises to “absolutely” fight for passage of the Carbon Tax.

However, 2017 has seen a pretty dramatic shake up in Montpelier with a new Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Speaker of the House, Senate President Pro Tem, as well as several committee chairs. Though the new Speaker of the House, Mitzi Johnson (D-S. Hero) sounds a lot like defeated gubernatorial candidate Sue Minter when speaking of the Carbon Tax by refusing to say if she would support it or not, we can try to read the tea leaves through her actions thus far.

During the last biennium the bulk of the advocacy and work for a Carbon Tax took place in the House Natural Resources & Energy Committee. That no longer exists, changed and split into a new Energy & Technology Committee and an expanded Fish, Wildlife & Natural Resources Committee.

Johnson put Rep. Steve Carr (D-Brandon) in charge of the new Energy Committee, replacing retiring Tony Klein as Chair, which can only be a good thing. No one was more zealous than Klein about passing a Carbon Tax. Also gone from that committee are Carbon Tax sponsors Reps. Kesha Ram (failed bid for Lt. Governor) and lead sponsor Mary Sullivan (D-Burlington), whom Johnson moved to the new Fish, Wildlife and Natural Resources committee. Moving onto the Energy Committee is Rep. Corey Parent (R-St. Albans) who ran as a staunch opponent of the Carbon Tax in 2016, trouncing his opponent on the issue. This is generally positive as any Carbon Tax legislation would certainly have to pass through a committee with “energy” in it’s title.

However, Johnson did end up putting both lead sponsors of the Carbon Tax , Sullivan and David Deen (D-Westminister) together on the new Fish, Wildlife & Natural Resources Committee, where who knows what mischief they can concoct.

Changes on the Senate side are not so benign. Newly minted Senator Chris Pearson (P/D-Chittenden), who led the House Climate Caucus as a representative, will join Chris Bray (D-Addison), Brian Campion (D-Bennington), and Mark MacDonald (D-Orange), and John Rogers (D-Essex) on the Senate Natural Resources & Energy Committee. All but Rogers are reliable climate warriors , though MacDonald indicated some skittishness about the Carbon Tax after incumbents in his Orange County district, Reps. Patsy French, Sarah Buxton, Susan Hatch-Davis, all lost re-election bids largely over the Carbon Tax issue.

In conclusion, the Carbon Tax issue is not going away, but efforts to promote it will likely shift from the house to the senate, and, with a Scott veto threat lurking, strategies will shift from short term to longer term passage.

We’ll keep watching closely!

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

William Hays January 14, 2017 at 5:33 am

Sounds, to me, like our fish, wildlife, and natural resources are going to suffer from Johnson’s “musical chairs”.

Reply

Jim Bulmer January 14, 2017 at 2:15 pm

What is it with these Dems in Montpelier? One would think that any clear thinking rational individual would get the message sent during the last state election. Vermonters are OPPOSED to the carbon tax. Why do they keep beating on this dead hose in their attempt to jam this unwanted tax through the legislatufe??? Thank heavens for Governor Scott.

Reply

Allan Morrir January 15, 2017 at 1:40 am

The carbon tax will drive businesses away and the residents of Vermont will leave the state when they can afford it. For myself, I will move to New York where the cost of living will be cheaper. The carbon tax will only increase the coffers of Vermont spending and not help the environment. The people proposing the tax, do they drive electric cars and have alternative fuels for heating? Let them who are for the tax pay for tax and leave the rest of us out of the equation. O

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

State House Headliners

By Guy Page Republished with permission from Page Communications.  H170, legalized possession of an ounce of marijuana and two adult and five juvenile plants, was approved by the House Judiciary...

Roll Call! House Votes to Allow Confiscation of Firearms If There Are Allegations of Domestic Abuse

  . H.422 – AN ACT RELATING TO REMOVAL OF FIREARMS FROM A PERSON ARRESTED OR CITED FOR DOMESTIC ASSAULT.  . PASSED in the State House of Representatives...

The State: We Can’t Afford To Pay, But You Can!

by Rob Roper The funding mechanism for the Paid Family Leave bill (H. 196) is a 0.93% payroll tax, which would raise about $80 million. The original language...

National Institute of Health Boondoggles

by John McClaughry President Trump wants to cut $6 billion from the budget of the National Institutes of Health, and the medical community is screaming. Certainly the NIH does...

Crossover Overview: Where Key Bills Stand

By Guy Page Like baby sea turtles marching slowly across the beach by their thousands to temporary safety, a minority of the hundreds of bills introduced into the...

Video