Welch Votes Against Anti-Carbon Tax Resolution

July 23, 2018

by Rob Roper

Congress voted on a resolution introduced by Rep. Steve Scalise (R-LA) titled, “Expressing the sense of Congress that a Carbon Tax Would be detrimental to the United States Economy.”

The full text of the resolution reads:

Rep. Peter Welch (D-VT)

Whereas a carbon tax is a Federal tax on carbon released from fossil fuels;

             Whereas a carbon tax will increase energy prices, including the price of gasoline, electricity, natural gas, and home heating oil;

             Whereas a carbon tax will mean that families and consumers will pay more for essentials like food, gasoline, and electricity;

             Whereas a carbon tax will fall hardest on the poor, the elderly, and those on fixed incomes;

             Whereas a carbon tax will lead to more jobs and businesses moving overseas;

             Whereas a carbon tax will lead to less economic growth;

             Whereas American families will be harmed the most from a carbon tax;

             Whereas, according to the Energy Information Administration, in 2016, fossil fuels share of energy consumption was 81 percent;

             Whereas a carbon tax will increase the cost of every good manufactured in the United States;

             Whereas a carbon tax will impose disproportionate burdens on certain industries, jobs, States, and geographic regions and would further restrict the global competitiveness of the United States;

             Whereas American ingenuity has led to innovations in energy exploration and development and has increased production of domestic energy resources on private and State-owned land which has created significant job growth and private capital investment;

             Whereas United States energy policy should encourage continued private sector innovation and development and not increase the existing tax burden on manufacturers;

             Whereas the production of American energy resources increases the United States ability to maintain a competitive advantage in today’s global economy;

             Whereas a carbon tax would reduce America’s global competitiveness and would encourage development abroad in countries that do not impose this exorbitant tax burden; and

             Whereas the Congress and the President should focus on pro-growth solutions that encourage increased development of domestic resources: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that a carbon tax would be detrimental to American families and businesses, and is not in the best interest of the United States.

The final vote  (229-180) was largely along party lines with all but one Republican supporting the resolution and all but seven Democrats opposing (17 were absent and two voted “present”. Vermont’s Peter Welch voted no, thus supporting the concept of a Carbon Tax.

– Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

SHAZZAM July 23, 2018 at 2:23 pm

As Mr. Welch continues to disgrace his state and country, conservatives are held hostage to his congressional ineptness.
TERM LIMIT POSTER BOY

Reply

Robert July 23, 2018 at 2:31 pm

If there is one thing you can always be sure Peter Welch will be in favor of, it is raising taxes on Vermonters. He is the typical big-government-loving liberal who believes taxes will never be high enough until we are completely enslaved by the government, and people like him are handing out the the goods and services required to live on. He is proof that Vermonters do not think before they vote, vote on emotion father than facts, are easily duped, and are ignorant of the fact that every vote cast for big-government-loving liberals like Welch, Leahy and Sanders is a vote to put themselves in chains.

Reply

William Hays July 28, 2018 at 4:18 pm

The “Three Stooges” rule! Scary!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

The Quebec Election

October 18, 2018 by John McClaughry Most Vermonters live within an hour’s drive of Quebec, Canada, yet it’s astonishing how little we know about events taking place in...

School choice, not Pre-K, key to attracting young families

October 16, 2018 by Rob Roper In their recent debate, Governor Scott and democratic candidate Christine Hallquist both expressed their policy preference for expanding government-run pre-k programs. Scott...

Why Venezuela Matters

October 15, 2018  By John J. Metzler UNITED NATIONS—It didn’t have to be this way.  An oil rich, economically prosperous middle class country, once a stable Latin American...

EAI Comments on Individual Mandate Working Group draft report

  October 11, 2018 Herewith are our comments on the Working Group’s draft product. The legislature is concerned that with the repeal of the Obamacare insurance mandate, individual...

High Minimum Wages Were Designed to Hurt Minorities

October 5, 2018 by Rob Roper With institutional racism becoming an increasingly discussed topic in Vermont, it is ironic that some of our legislators are again promising to...

Video