VPIRG really can’t defend their Carbon Tax plan

March 8, 2018

by Rob Roper

VPIRG’s executive director, Paul Burns, has an op-ed in Vermont Digger (and probably other Vermont papers) today. It’s disappointing that he offers nothing substantial to support the ESSEX Carbon Tax or to refute EAI’s arguments against the scheme. He’s insulting in calling us “nutty”, selling “snake oil,” and misleading when he says we are “on the payroll of the fossil fuel industry.” This is completely false. Though it is worth noting that many VPIRG donors and board members stand to financially benefit from a Carbon Tax that subsidizes their renewable electricity businesses and/or mandates that Vermonters buy their product.

Burns’ attempts to mislead don’t end with false claims about the Ethan Allen Institute; he misleads Vermonters about the ESSEX Carbon Tax.

Burns says, “Vermonters will collectively save a dollar on low-carbon electricity for every additional dollar they pay for polluting fossil fuels.” According to the plan only 50% of the revenue raised would be used to generally reduce electric rates. So, for most Vermonters this is a scheme that takes $10 from one pocket and puts $5 back into the other. A rip off. The other half of the revenue would be divided between low income rebates (300% of poverty or less) and rural rebates for households earning less than $150,000. If you don’t fall into both of these categories – and most Vermonters don’t — you’re screwed under the ESSEX Carbon Tax.

Even if you are both rural and poor, in most cases you would still have to buy an electric vehicle, solar panels, an electric heat pump, or some such thing in order to break even.

Burns says, “Further, the plan is revenue neutral – meaning there is no change in state government spending.” Not really. Yes, the money raised will be redistributed, but only what’s left after the state pockets the overhead for collecting and monitoring the tax. Given how complex this mechanism is, the cost is likely to be very high. The Auditor of Accounts, for example, is charged with conducting at least two audits of the program each year, which by itself will be very expensive.

And, here’s what the bill says regarding electric utilities: “(c) Rate recovery; other provider expenses. A Vermont retail electricity provider shall have the opportunity to recover in retail rates its necessary and reasonable expenses….” Yes, folks, under the ESSEX Carbon Tax electric companies are authorized to RAISE your electric rates in order to cover the logistical costs of lowering your electric rates! They take out of one pocket what they put into the other. It’s a scam!

Burns says, “It’s true that the wealthiest and large corporations would pay their fair share as Vermont’s biggest polluters – while low- to moderate-income Vermonters would save money.” This is absolutely false. Ben & Jerry’s is one of Vermont’s wealthiest and largest corporations, and they testified that the ice cream maker will net nearly $1,000,000 in subsidies under the ESSEX Carbon Tax. That money will come from small, less wealthy businesses that rely on gasoline, diesel, and home heating fuel, such as contractors, landscapers, general stores, etc., who will end up paying more.

Of course, having the government force a bunch of small businesses to subsidize their electric bills IS good for Ben & Jerry’s business, as Burns notes. But he is not telling the truth when he implies this is good for Vermont business in general. It’s not.

Burns says, “State government isn’t responsible for picking winners or losers.” But, under the ESSEX Carbon Tax the state is picking electric based businesses (like wealthy Ben & Jerry’s) to be winners, and businesses that rely on trucks, vans, gas ovens and stoves, etc. to be losers. Pretending otherwise is insulting people’s intelligence.

The Ethan Allen Institute is willing to have a civil, substantive, and honest debate about the details of the ESSEX Carbon Tax. We are disappointed that Paul Burns and VPIRG are apparently not willing or able to engage on that level.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

H. Brooke Paige March 8, 2018 at 7:20 pm

VPRIG’s Trojan Horse !

While I know for fact that the EAI is in no one’s pocket – heck they run on a shoestring, but VPRIG has it’s hands lots of pockets including the Solar and Wind Profiteers, The Economy Strengthening Strategic Energy Exchange (which works out as ESSEE, not ESSEX!) is a wealth transfer scheme designed to take tax dollars from Vermont’s producers and hand it out to their allies and the unproductive – after skimming off a healthy percentage for their “overhead.”

The ESSEE (Essex?) Plan is just another tempting Trojan Horse; which, while appearing to be a wondrous gift is really disastrous trap !

“Beware of Greeks Bearing Gifts !” – Λαοκόων [Laocoön] about 670 BC

Reply

Jim March 9, 2018 at 10:17 pm

As has been said time and time again if one is interested in learning who benefits the most and that is “follow the money”. Do that and you’ll end up on VPRIG’S door step.

Reply

doug Richmond March 10, 2018 at 1:48 am

Burns wrote an absurd and irrational ra-ra for solar and wind- without mentioning either. His statements were self contradictory. Each statement was easily rebutted by his next claim.

Time for Vermonters to have their own thoughts, not follow the Pied Pipers

Reply

William Hays March 10, 2018 at 4:11 am

Thanks for outing scamster (or should I say crook?) Burns. Does Bernie, and the other two stooges, love him? I would guess “Ayup”. Beware, Gov. Scott.

Reply

Jack Welch March 10, 2018 at 10:30 am

Rob’s retort to the Burnsian propaganda needs to show up on the editorial pages of all of the State’s papers followed by a written invite to readers to go to a given web site where they’ll be able to peruse a roster of the Carbon Tax supporters in the House and in the Senate.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Your Taxes, Game Theory and the Shutdown

June 12, 2018 By David Flemming Will your taxes increase or won’t they? As EAI has written on previously, there aren’t any mainstream proposals from the Governor or...

End of “Net Neutrality” Already Benefiting Vermonters

June 12, 2018 by Rob Roper The 2015 “net neutrality” rules passed by the FCC in 2015 are now officially dead. When the Trump administration announced that it...

Vermont: The Hapless Blue State

June 11, 2018 by Chris Campion Vermont, fresh off the news that the state’s idea of fixing its legacy of opposition to business and economic growth is to pay...

Trade, Tariffs, Trump

June 8, 2018 By John J. Metzler UNITED NATIONS—In the midst of an expanding American economy, record low unemployment rates, and buoyant consumer confidence, the Trump Administration has...

Thoughts on the Colorado Cake Case

by John McClaughry Last week the US Supreme Court gave a partial victory to Colorado baker Jack Phillips, who had  declined to make an artistic cake for a...

Video