Vermont Single Payer and Medicare: The Facts

EAI Radio Ad

CLICK to hear EAI’s Radio Spot “Taking Over Medicare”

Conflicting statements by politicians and bureaucrats has led to some confusion surrounding language in Act 48 that requires the state government to seek waivers from the federal government that would allow Green Mountain Care (single payer) to control the dollars and administer the benefits for Medicare recipients. What exactly is the intent of the the law and legislators who passed the law.

What the Law Says

Act 48 says as passed in 2011:

(6) The director, in collaboration with the agency of human services, shall obtain waivers, exemptions, agreements, legislation, or a combination thereof to ensure that, to the extent possible under federal law, all federal payments provided within the state for health services are paid directly to Green Mountain Care. Green Mountain Care shall assume responsibility for the benefits and services previously paid for by the federal programs, including Medicaid, Medicare, and, after implementation, the Vermont health benefit exchange. In obtaining the waivers, exemptions, agreements, legislation, or combination thereof, the secretary shall negotiate with the federal government a federal contribution for health care services in Vermont that reflects medical inflation, the state gross domestic product, the size and age of the population, the number of residents living below the poverty level, the number of Medicare-eligible individuals, and other factors that may be advantageous to Vermont and that do not decrease in relation to the federal contribution to other states as a result of the waivers, exemptions, agreements, or savings from implementation of Green Mountain Care. (Act 48, Page 12)

And,

(e) The agency shall seek permission from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to be the administrator for the Medicare program in Vermont. If the agency is unsuccessful in obtaining such permission, Green Mountain Care shall be the secondary payer with respect to any health service that may be covered in whole or in part by Title XVIII of the Social Security Act (Medicare). (Act 48, page 85)

Who Voted For This Language?

Click HERE to see the final House roll call vote for H.202 (Act 48), passed 94-49, May 5, 2011.

Click HERE to see the final Senate roll call vote for H.202 (Act 48), passed 21-9, May 3, 2011

Act 144

The Act 48 language in statute was amended in 2014 via Act 144, deleting section (e) and adding:

(f) Green Mountain Care shall be the payer of last resort with respect to any health service that may be covered in whole or in part by any other health benefit plan, including Medicare, private health insurance, retiree health benefits, or federal health benefit plans offered by the military, or to federal employees.  

(As of this writing (10/26/14) the online statue has not been updated to reflect this, leading to a great deal of confusion.)

The Shumlin Administration and legislators who voted for Act 48 are now claiming that these changes absolve them from any original desire to “take over” Medicare.

However, Act 144 also states:

(b) The Green Mountain Care Board may take such steps as are necessary to include all payers in the global hospital budget pilot projects, including negotiating with the federal Center for Medicare & Medicaid Innovation to involve Medicare and Medicaid.

Although this language is certainly less onerous, it is more of a recognition that demanding the whole cake will not fly, so it’s better to politely ask for just one slice… to start.

 

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT Should Borrow Tax Exemption from Bernie’s Fatherland

July 15, 2019 By David Flemming What public policy has the best chance of convincing 20-somethings to stay in Vermont? A) Adopting a $15 Minimum Wage B) Passing...

Behavioral economics shows who’s responsible for rise in racism (if there really is one)

August 14, 2019 by Rob Roper Many news stories and opinion pieces in the Vermont media are opining about a rise in racism around our state and perhaps...

Statewide School Choice an Imperative as Schools Push Political Agenda

August 12, 2019 by Rob Roper For the past year or two, Vermont public schools have become increasingly, overtly political in the indoctrination of students to a political...

When the Rules Don’t Apply to Progressives

August 8, 2019 by Rob Roper So, Google hosted a three day summit on climate change in Sicily. Attendees, including the likes of Barak Obama, Leonardo DiCaprio, and...

VT Unaffordability Overshadows Unique Benefits

July 7, 2019 By David Flemming Wallethub completed an extremely compelling survey which looks at the “best states for Millennials.” Vermont didn’t do too shabby, coming in at #13...

Video