This Family’s Story Is Why School Choice MUST BE A RIGHT

By Rob Roper

Rep. Dave Sharpe (D-Bristol) opened an afternoon of testimony from advocates of Vermont’s school choice system by qualifying, “Our responsibility here in the legislature… is the education of all the children in the state, so that puts us in a bit of a bind sometimes when we think about our own children, our own community versus the entire state,” a subtle signal to his House Education Committee members to not take what they were about to hear all that seriously, at least insofar as it should not influence their anti-school choice policy decisions.

But, if you can listen to this testimony from parents Matt and Tiffany Young about their family’s experience and still oppose school choice, you have no heart. Or a sense of fiscal responsibility for that matter.

The Young’s story illustrates how access to independent schools or an alternative public school in another district that is the right fit for a particular child cannot only benefit that child tremendously, but also save taxpayers tens if not hundreds of thousands of dollars.

The Young’s story explodes the myths that Vermont’s independent schools, which can only exist within Vermont’s unique and special tuitioning system (now under attack by Act 46 proponents), are elitist and “cherry pick” only the best students. They explode the myth that public schools must take all students, regardless of needs.

Matt Young testified, “Our son is smart, quirky, gifted, and learns differently. Our son was struggling in [the local public] school, in tears often, not doing his work, his grades weren’t the best, he was losing weight, he was full of anxiety, he tried to run away from school more than once. He developed a facial tic, and it was heartbreaking.”

“Almost every day we would get a call from the school: We need another meeting, we need another specialist, we need a different diagnosis, we need another label…. They made him wear a weighted vest and squeeze a bright colored ball. Everything they did made him feel different, and increased his anxiety and his fight or flight response.”

The Youngs went on to detail their painful experiences with the school and the school district, which threatened to (and finally did) expel their son if the family refused to put the child on medications that the boy’s doctor said would be detrimental to his health and well being.

The boy’s doctor and therapist as well as his parents agreed that moving him to an independent school was the best option for the child, but the school board refused due to politics and the desire to keep the $12,000 dollars necessary for such placement in the public school system – even though this cost was significantly less than keeping him in the public school as a “special needs” student.

The Youngs took matters into their own hands and enrolled their son in the Thaddeus Stephens School. Long story short (please watch the whole video!), after three years at Thaddeus Stephens:

“Our son is thriving, he takes no medication, his grades are fantastic, he’s had no major issues with discipline, and certainly no physical restraints. He developed a great sense of humor, he just had a major part in a school play, played a solo on the trumpet in the school concert, he’s on the Math Counts team, he just won the DAR writing contest for the entire state at his grade level. He was the leading scorer on his hockey team, and his facial tic is all but gone.”

This is not an attack on the public school system. As the Youngs point out, many children thrive in their local public school and there are many excellent teachers. But, that school was not the right fit for their child. Denying their child – any child –the right to find a school that meets his or her particular needs and gives them the opportunity to thrive is unjust to the child, the family — and to the taxpayers.

The Young’s son was not a “special needs” student as labeled by the public school system. He just needed a different school. How many other square pegs are being hammered into round holes by our school system, at great damage to the child and great cost to the taxpayers?

Proponents of Act 46 are doing their best to snuff out the tuitioning (school choice) towns in Vermont that allow for schools like Thaddeus Stephens to exist, and to deny children and families like the Youngs the power to do what’s right. This, despite assurances before the law passed, that tuitioning towns would be protected under the law.

Please contact your legislators today and tell them to fix Act 46 to protect school choice towns – as they promised to do – this year.

Find you legislators HERE.

Members of the House Education Committee

Members of the Senate Education Committee

And, if you have a similar story about your own experiences with school choice, please share! 

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Jim Bulmer March 26, 2016 at 8:13 pm

IMr. Sharpe, if you truly belive your responsibility is to educate the children of Vermont, please tell me why the NEA calls all the shots. The union leader a few years back made a statement to the effect that the teacher’s well fare comes first. The education of the kids comes next. Hello, Mr. Sharpe.

Reply

James Hall April 13, 2016 at 11:53 am

Unfortunately, the special needs system is broken. This system is more about money than the well being of children. I work in a school system and see a small % of what goes on, in the special needs area, it is all about money. The special needs directors have unbelievable power, even over the superintendents. Trust me, I see it each day.

Reply

Mary August 27, 2017 at 2:12 am

I did go to one meeting for act 46 and at the time I did not fully understand what the committee was trying to explain! After listening to these two stories that these young families each expressed what their child was going through at the public school, I think we need to do a complete report on all student enrollment to see how many of our students are being drugged so that they can attend school! There is something really wrong in our school system! We are turning our young children into drug addicts and we must stop and analyze why this is happening!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Tax Plan, Schmax Plan: It’s The Spending, Stupid

by Chris Campion The GOP has recently been working on tax reform, and both the House and Senate have versions of tax reform that are currently being hashed...

Renewable Policies Responsible for GMP’s $80 million rate increase

by Guy Page Green Mountain Power’s proposed 2018 5% rate increase will cost ratepayers $80 million, Vermontbiz.com said November 27. GMP spokesperson Kristen Carlson blames the hike on increased transmission, regional...

Exxon Mobil ‘s “Green Preening”

by John McClaughry Here’s a news item some will find surprising. The American Legislative Exchange Council is a conservative business-oriented association of legislators and corporation interests. Recently it...

New Hampshire Lowers Taxes, Raises Revenue

by Rob Roper The New Hampshire Union Leader recently posted an editorial about their legislature’s 2015 decision to cut taxes on New Hampshire businesses. The tax cuts are...

Survey: Do You Support the ESSEX Carbon Tax Proposal

TAKE THE SURVEY! Do you support the new “ESSEX” Carbon Tax proposal? This would ultimately be a $240 million tax on gasoline (32¢/gal), heating oil and diesel fuel...

Video