The tricky mental illness rationale for gun control

by John McCkaughry

The cry has gone up to “keep guns out of the hands of people with mental illness”. What may sound reasonable, says Jacob Sullum of reason.com, “casts an unmanageably broad net into the wrong ocean.”

Federal law currently disqualifies from purchasing a gun only those who have undergone forcible psychiatric treatment, based on a legal finding that they pose a danger to themselves or others. That rule is already unreasonably broad, since it means that someone who poses no threat to other people—someone who, say, is committed for treatment because his relatives think he might be suicidal—is not allowed to exercise his constitutional right to armed self-defense, even decades later.

Survey data indicate that half of all Americans will qualify for a psychiatric diagnosis at some point in their lives, while a quarter of them do in any given year. The question is whether the Florida school shooter Nikolas Cruz could have been thwarted by a policy that goes further than the current rule, but not as far as disarming one-half or one-quarter of the population.

A California law enacted in 2014 allows a police officer or an “immediate family member” to seek a “gun violence restraining order” that prohibits an individual from possessing firearms and authorizes police to seize any he currently owns. That leaves a lot of leeway to unjustifiably deprive people of their constitutional rights, whether out of malice or out of sincere but mistaken concern.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

William Hays February 24, 2018 at 5:14 pm

California has to have the stupidest gun-control laws on the books, among other laws. Illinois and New York aren’t far behind. Vermont should not change its law. Gun-control is not the solution, except for certified loons and felons.

Reply

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

The Quebec Election

October 18, 2018 by John McClaughry Most Vermonters live within an hour’s drive of Quebec, Canada, yet it’s astonishing how little we know about events taking place in...

School choice, not Pre-K, key to attracting young families

October 16, 2018 by Rob Roper In their recent debate, Governor Scott and democratic candidate Christine Hallquist both expressed their policy preference for expanding government-run pre-k programs. Scott...

Why Venezuela Matters

October 15, 2018  By John J. Metzler UNITED NATIONS—It didn’t have to be this way.  An oil rich, economically prosperous middle class country, once a stable Latin American...

EAI Comments on Individual Mandate Working Group draft report

  October 11, 2018 Herewith are our comments on the Working Group’s draft product. The legislature is concerned that with the repeal of the Obamacare insurance mandate, individual...

High Minimum Wages Were Designed to Hurt Minorities

October 5, 2018 by Rob Roper With institutional racism becoming an increasingly discussed topic in Vermont, it is ironic that some of our legislators are again promising to...

Video