The tricky mental illness rationale for gun control

by John McCkaughry

The cry has gone up to “keep guns out of the hands of people with mental illness”. What may sound reasonable, says Jacob Sullum of reason.com, “casts an unmanageably broad net into the wrong ocean.”

Federal law currently disqualifies from purchasing a gun only those who have undergone forcible psychiatric treatment, based on a legal finding that they pose a danger to themselves or others. That rule is already unreasonably broad, since it means that someone who poses no threat to other people—someone who, say, is committed for treatment because his relatives think he might be suicidal—is not allowed to exercise his constitutional right to armed self-defense, even decades later.

Survey data indicate that half of all Americans will qualify for a psychiatric diagnosis at some point in their lives, while a quarter of them do in any given year. The question is whether the Florida school shooter Nikolas Cruz could have been thwarted by a policy that goes further than the current rule, but not as far as disarming one-half or one-quarter of the population.

A California law enacted in 2014 allows a police officer or an “immediate family member” to seek a “gun violence restraining order” that prohibits an individual from possessing firearms and authorizes police to seize any he currently owns. That leaves a lot of leeway to unjustifiably deprive people of their constitutional rights, whether out of malice or out of sincere but mistaken concern.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

William Hays February 24, 2018 at 5:14 pm

California has to have the stupidest gun-control laws on the books, among other laws. Illinois and New York aren’t far behind. Vermont should not change its law. Gun-control is not the solution, except for certified loons and felons.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

A Response to “Who’s Really Politicizing Our Kids”

June 13, 2019 by Rob Roper The following is in response to a letter that appeared in the Caledonian Record on June 10th by Steven Isham.  To the...

VPIRG’s Plastic Agenda

June 12, 2019 By John McClaughry The plastic bag ban is sitting on Gov. Phil Scott’s desk. If he signs it, Statehouse Chronicle writer Guy Page reports, a working...

The Blittersdorf Special

June 11, 2019 By John McClaughry Remember the Champlain Flyer? That was Howard Dean’s commuter train that ran 13 miles from Charlotte to Burlington. After three years’ operation...

Roll Call! Senate Blocks Amendment to Remove Insurance Innovation from Bill (7-22), 2019

S.131 – AN ACT RELATING TO INSURANCE AND SECURITIES (BARUTH AMENDMENT) FAILED in the State Senate on April 3, 2019 by a vote of  7-22  . Purpose: The Amendment called for removing...

California Prison Drugs

June 7, 2019 By John McClaughry Steven Greenhut, writing in the Orange County (California) Register, makes an interesting point about drugs in prisons. He quotes a San Francisco...

Video