Survey: Do You Support the ESSEX Carbon Tax Proposal

TAKE THE SURVEY!

Do you support the new “ESSEX” Carbon Tax proposal? This would ultimately be a $240 milliondownload-6 tax on gasoline (32¢/gal), heating oil and diesel fuel (though not dyed diesel) (40¢/gal), and natural gas and propane (24¢/gal). Fifty percent of this revenue would be used to subsidize Vermont’s electric utilities for the purpose of lowering electric rates, and the other half would be redistributed to low-income and rural Vermonters via a rebate scheme. 

          Yes.
          No. 

CLICK HERE TO TAKE THE SURVEY

{ 7 comments… read them below or add one }

S Young December 12, 2017 at 12:59 am

I will never support a carbon tax

Reply

Informed Citizen of VT December 12, 2017 at 4:39 am

Lowest Electric Rates In the area? Sign me up for the carbon tax that will benefit me in multiple ways.

https://vtdigger.org/2017/11/12/carbon-tax-floated-energy-conference/

Reply

Matthew Katz December 12, 2017 at 11:58 am

As a disabled combat veteran living on a fixed income just above the poverty level. This is going to hurt my family bad. This is going to force us to have to move out of Vermont since we can barely afford the heating costs as it is since we don’t qualify for any public assistance.

Reply

Barbara December 13, 2017 at 12:01 am

This state is taxing all of us to death. I can not afford to pay anymore for propane than I do now. It cost me 600.00 a month last year and I expect it to be the same this year. And why are there solar panels in every field around this state? I thought that was going to save us money on our electric bill? It hasnt at all my bill is still 135-185 and thats another scam. This state is doing nothing but scamming all of us. Keep raising the taxes and your going to see a lot of the younger generation leave, they can not make ends meet here.

Reply

buffalo December 13, 2017 at 9:50 am

Politicians will spend it all. No poor Vermonter will see one penny. Gas prices and heating will be higher. Electric rates will continue to rise as they hae over the last few years.

Reply

Dan December 13, 2017 at 11:22 pm

The carbon tax will drive the last nail in the coffin of the working Vermonter. A tax on our heating oil, fuel and god knows what else will kill us. The buisnesses impact ed by the taxes will raise their prices to offset the tax burden and again the working man and woman get hosed. NO carbon tax. For the love of god wake up and see why Forbes has us listed as the 48th worst state to do business in.

Reply

Debbie December 21, 2017 at 3:38 pm

This tax would hurt most those people already struggling to get by. Gasoline to drive to and from a job and fuel oil and propane to keep our families from freezing in the winter are NOT luxuries we cannot do without. Besides, electricity is not as clean and efficient of an energy source as these politicians would have us believe.

“Fifty percent of this revenue would be used to subsidize Vermont’s electric utilities for the purpose of lowering electric rates” Why electricity? If it is so cost-effective, it shouldn’t need a subsidy.

The “other half would be redistributed to low-income and rural Vermonters via a rebate scheme.” This is just another way to redistribute the wealth by taxing us all to death, and then giving a little of the money back, after deducting administrative costs paid to officials of an already bloated government and their friends.

No thanks!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Do Vasectomies Prevent Dictators?

November 16, 2018 By David Flemming George Plumb claimed in a November 9 VTDigger commentary that men should feel obligated to get vasectomies to prevent authoritarians from using booming populations...

Dealing with Pre-Existing Conditions

November 15, 2018 by John McClaughry During the last national election campaign Democrats scored points by attacking Republicans for wanting to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing...

When a Liberal State Rejects a Carbon Tax

November 14, 2018 By David Flemming When asked bluntly, even the most liberal voters hate carbon taxes. That was made evident in the state of Washington on Election...

Climate issues fared poorly on state ballots 

November 14, 2018 by John McClaughry The very liberal Washington Post ran a story on November 7 on the fate of climate change issues on state ballots. Their...

How I Voted Three Times. Or not.

by Rob Roper I voted three times last Tuesday. Or maybe I didn’t. My point is, you have no idea. You see, I have two kids who recently...

Video