Study: Carbon Tax Would Increase World Hunger

August 30, 2018

by Rob Roper

Bjorn Lomborg of the Copenhagen Consensus Center recently brought to our attention a study done by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) on what a global Carbon Tax would do to those suffering from hunger around the world. Their conclusion, in a nutshell:

… a single climate mitigation scheme applied to all sectors, such as a global carbon tax, could have a serious impact on agriculture and result in far more widespread hunger and food insecurity than the direct impacts of climate change.

Specifically, they note that the additional cost a worldwide Carbon Tax would add to agricultural products would put between 70 million and 170 million more people at risk for hunger, especially those living in sub Saharan Africa and India. This is roughly three times more than the 24 to 50 million people who might benefit from any mitigation of climate change because of the tax.

Lomberg points out that under the Paris agreement the European Union alone would have to spend about $600 billion each year for the rest of the century to comply with the regulations, and the net result would be a reduction of just 0.09°F by the end of the century. Not just compensation for 170 million starving people!

The authors of the study are not climate change “deniers,” and do stress the need to reduce emissions. However, they rightly advise, “When designing climate mitigation policies, policymakers need to scrutinize other factors and development goals more closely, rather than focusing only on the goal of reducing emissions.” Like not starving millions of people with your “solutions.”

Vermont policy makers and Carbon Tax activists should take heed. They are constantly saying “we must do something! Are you suggesting we do nothing!” But, if that something does more harm than good to the people of our state – like a Carbon Tax certainly would – you are, in fact, better off not doing anything.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Roger Joslin August 30, 2018 at 8:11 pm

Finally some people with a brain are weighing in on this.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Roll Call! Senate Passes Unrestricted Right to Abortion Up to the Point of Delivery (24-6), 2019

. H.57- AN ACT RELATING TO PRESERVING THE RIGHT TO ABORTION . PASSED in the State Senate on May 7, 2019, by a vote of 24-6 . Purpose: To...

How Sweet It Was

June 25, 2019 by Lynn J Edmunds The passing of a family member is a sad occasion, sometimes leaving us to speculate why when it’s premature or untimely. On...

Trump Administration expands HRAs

June 20, 2019 by John McClaughry Two weeks ago the Trump administration finalized a rule to expand the use of tax free Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs). Up to...

A Response to “Who’s Really Politicizing Our Kids”

June 13, 2019 by Rob Roper The following is in response to a letter that appeared in the Caledonian Record on June 10th by Steven Isham.  To the...

VPIRG’s Plastic Agenda

June 12, 2019 By John McClaughry The plastic bag ban is sitting on Gov. Phil Scott’s desk. If he signs it, Statehouse Chronicle writer Guy Page reports, a working...

Video