Study: Carbon Tax Would Increase World Hunger

August 30, 2018

by Rob Roper

Bjorn Lomborg of the Copenhagen Consensus Center recently brought to our attention a study done by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA) on what a global Carbon Tax would do to those suffering from hunger around the world. Their conclusion, in a nutshell:

… a single climate mitigation scheme applied to all sectors, such as a global carbon tax, could have a serious impact on agriculture and result in far more widespread hunger and food insecurity than the direct impacts of climate change.

Specifically, they note that the additional cost a worldwide Carbon Tax would add to agricultural products would put between 70 million and 170 million more people at risk for hunger, especially those living in sub Saharan Africa and India. This is roughly three times more than the 24 to 50 million people who might benefit from any mitigation of climate change because of the tax.

Lomberg points out that under the Paris agreement the European Union alone would have to spend about $600 billion each year for the rest of the century to comply with the regulations, and the net result would be a reduction of just 0.09°F by the end of the century. Not just compensation for 170 million starving people!

The authors of the study are not climate change “deniers,” and do stress the need to reduce emissions. However, they rightly advise, “When designing climate mitigation policies, policymakers need to scrutinize other factors and development goals more closely, rather than focusing only on the goal of reducing emissions.” Like not starving millions of people with your “solutions.”

Vermont policy makers and Carbon Tax activists should take heed. They are constantly saying “we must do something! Are you suggesting we do nothing!” But, if that something does more harm than good to the people of our state – like a Carbon Tax certainly would – you are, in fact, better off not doing anything.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Roger Joslin August 30, 2018 at 8:11 pm

Finally some people with a brain are weighing in on this.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Do Vasectomies Prevent Dictators?

November 16, 2018 By David Flemming George Plumb claimed in a November 9 VTDigger commentary that men should feel obligated to get vasectomies to prevent authoritarians from using booming populations...

Dealing with Pre-Existing Conditions

November 15, 2018 by John McClaughry During the last national election campaign Democrats scored points by attacking Republicans for wanting to deny health insurance to people with pre-existing...

When a Liberal State Rejects a Carbon Tax

November 14, 2018 By David Flemming When asked bluntly, even the most liberal voters hate carbon taxes. That was made evident in the state of Washington on Election...

Climate issues fared poorly on state ballots 

November 14, 2018 by John McClaughry The very liberal Washington Post ran a story on November 7 on the fate of climate change issues on state ballots. Their...

How I Voted Three Times. Or not.

by Rob Roper I voted three times last Tuesday. Or maybe I didn’t. My point is, you have no idea. You see, I have two kids who recently...

Video