Roll Call! Senate Passes Background Checks for Private Firearm Purchases

Roll Call Graphic
PASSED
in the State Senate on March 1, 2018 by a vote of
17-13 

.
Purpose: To mandate that the private transfer of firearms by sale, gift or other between individuals to undergo a background check.
.
Analysis: The Baruth Amendment would require those selling, giving or otherwise transferring ownership of a gun to undergo a federal criminal background check performed by a licensed firearms dealer. Exemptions are made for members of the military, law enforcement officials, and transactions between immediate family members.

Those voting YES believe the measure will help prevent future mass shootings or other gun violence.

Those voting NO believe this constitutes an undue financial and logistical burden on law abiding gun owners. The background check process can cost as much as $100 (often more than the firearm itself), and finding a licensed firearms dealer to perform the check could prove difficult. Moreover, they believe that this measure will not keep guns out of the hands of criminals, and therefore will not prevent violent crimes.
.
Senate Journal, Thursday, March 1, 2018“Thereupon, the recommendation of amendment was agreed to on a roll call, Yeas 17, Nays 13.” (Read the Journal, p. 327-332)


How They Voted

(Click on Your Senator’s Name to Send an Email)

Timothy Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) – YES
Claire Ayer (D-Addison) – YES
Becca Balint (D-Windham) – YES
Philip Baruth (D-Chittenden) – YES
Joseph Benning (R-Caledonia) – NO
Carolyn Branagan (R-Franklin) – NO
Christopher Bray (D-Addison) – YES
Randy Brock (R-Franklin) – NO
Francis Brooks (D-Washington) – YES
Brian Campion (D-Bennington) – YES
Alison Clarkson (D-Windsor) – YES
Brian Collamore (R-Rutland) – NO
Ann Cummings (D-Washington) – YES
Margaret Flory (R-Rutland) – NO
Debbie Ingram (D-Chittendent) – YES
M. Jane Kitchel (D-Caledonia) – NO
Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden) – YES
Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) – YES
Richard Mazza (D-Chittenden-Grand Isle) – NO
Richard McCormack (D-Windsor) – YES
Alice Nitka (D-Windsor District) – NO
Chris Pearson (P-Chittenden) – YES
Anthony Pollina (P/D/W-Washington) – YES
John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) – NO
Richard Sears (D-Bennington) – NO
Michael Sirotkin (D-Chittenden) – YES
David Soucy (R-Rutland) – NO
Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) – NO
Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) – NO
Jeanette White (D-Windham) – YES

Not yet signed up? Join the EAI email list today.

 

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

VT is Lucky to Have High-Tax Neighbors, But Still Loses Migrants

September 20, 2019 By David Flemming Vermont lost more than twice as many people to distant, less taxed states than it gained from mostly neighboring states that were...

Henninger on Democrats and climate

September 19, 2019 by John McClaughry In the Wall Street Journal a week ago columnist Daniel Henninger described the Democratic presidential candidates in that marathon CNN climate debate....

Constitution Day 2019 

September 17, 2019 by John McClaughry It has probably escaped most people’s attention, but today, September 17,  is Constitution Day. The Founders strongly believed that of all the...

Cannibalism and Climate Catastrophe

September 13, 2019 By David Flemming Vermont has been exploring less traditional means of taking care of our dead for years. Now, some climate alarmists are suggesting that...

“Did It Work?” A Theme Emerges

September 9, 2019 by Rob Roper Henry Epp of VPR has been working on a terrific series of articles under the umbrella theme of “Did It Work?” It...

Video