Roll Call! Senate Overrides Veto of Chemical Bill (22-8), 2018

.
PASSED
in the State Senate on April 19, 2018 by a vote of

22-8 
.
Purpose: T0 give the commissioner of health more authority to regulate toxic chemicals in children’s products.
 .
Analysis: Those who voted YES believe that S.103 would require manufacturers to be more careful about what they put into children’s products. It would help Vermont children avoid exposure to toxic chemicals in children’s products, thus improving children’s health outcomes.
 .
Those who voted NO supported Gov. Scott’s position that S.103 is “redundant and constitutionally suspect,” and, “will jeopardize jobs and make Vermont less competitive for businesses.”  S.103 would make chemical regulation much more arbitrary, potentially more political, and much less scientific and legitimate as it would allow a single state official to make the decision about banning certain children’s products and would allow the decision to be made after a single peer-reviewed study, rather than the current standard of considering multiple studies.
.
Current Vermont law requires that, before denoting a chemical as unsuited for contact with children, the Commissioner of Health shall consider recommendations from a Working Group of environmental and manufacturing stakeholders to determine if the degree to which children are exposed to this chemical on a daily basis exceeds the chemical levels that raise health concerns. S.103 would remove the “health risks” criterion, and rely solely on the exposure criterion, effectively removing the need for established scientific evidence to ban the use of chemicals that have been diluted safely.
.
Vermont’s current standards governing children’s exposure to chemicals are only 4 years old, passed in 2014 after extensive debate. The first chemical reporting deadline under these new regulations was last year. Vermont has only begun to work through administrative concerns ahead of further rule making in 2018.
.
Senate Journal, Thursday, April 19, 2018. “Shall the bill pass, notwithstanding the refusal of the Governor to approve it?, was decided in the affirmative on a roll call required by the Vermont Constitution, Yeas 22, Nays 8.” (Read the Journal, p. 732)
.

How They Voted

(Click on Your Senator’s Name to Send an Email)

Timothy Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) – YES
Claire Ayer (D-Addison) – YES
Becca Balint (D-Windham) – YES
Philip Baruth (D-Chittenden) – YES
Joseph Benning (R-Caledonia) – NO
Carolyn Branagan (R-Franklin) – NO
Christopher Bray (D-Addison) – YES
Randy Brock (R-Franklin) – NO
Francis Brooks (D-Washington) – YES
Brian Campion (D-Bennington) – YES
Alison Clarkson (D-Windsor) – YES
Brian Collamore (R-Rutland) – NO
Ann Cummings (D-Washington) – YES
Margaret Flory (R-Rutland) – NO
Debbie Ingram (D-Chittendent) – YES
M. Jane Kitchel (D-Caledonia) – YES
Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden) – YES
Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) – YES
Richard Mazza (D-Chittenden-Grand Isle) – NO
Richard McCormack (D-Windsor) – YES
Alice Nitka (D-Windsor District) – YES
Chris Pearson (P-Chittenden) – YES
Anthony Pollina (P/D/W-Washington) – YES
John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) – YES
Richard Sears (D-Bennington) – YES
Michael Sirotkin (D-Chittenden) – YES
David Soucy (R-Rutland) – NO
Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) – YES
Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) – NO
Jeanette White (D-Windham) – YES

Not yet signed up? Join the EAI email list today.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Roll Call! Senate Votes for 24 Hour Waiting Period for Handgun Purchase (20-10), 2019

. S.169 – AN ACT RELATING TO FIREARMS PROCEDURES . PASSED in the State Senate on March 21, 2019 by a vote of 20-10  . Purpose: To impose a 24 hour waiting period...

Here Comes the Back Door Carbon Tax

March 22, 2019 by Rob Roper Due very soon on the House floor is a measure to double taxes on home heating fuel and dyed diesel fuel. The...

Paying People to Move Here is Still Not Good Policy

March 21, 2019 by Rob Roper A recent headline boasted, “Attracted by the promise of $10,000, new workers start arriving in Vermont.” Great. How many? Eighteen. Forty-seven when...

Proposal  5 to Amend the VT Constitution

March 18, 2019 by John McClaughry Proposal 5 to amend the Vermont Constitution to promote “reproductive liberty”, is now under Senate consideration. I don’t propose to discuss the...

An AP Climate Story

March 15, 2019 by John McClaughry Here’s an interesting story from Associated Press, dated June 29, 1989: “A senior U.N. environmental official says entire nations could be wiped...

Video