Roll Call! Senate Employs Quotas to Help End Systematic Racism (12-18), 2018

.
FAILED
in the State Senate on March 21, 2018 by a vote of
12-18 

.
Purpose: To remove a provision in S.281 that mandated at least three “persons of color” be appointed to a newly created Civil Rights Advisory Panel.
.
Analysis: The intent of the underlying bill, S.281, was to create an independent board “to promote racial justice reform throughout the State.” The Brock Amendment would have voided a provision of the bill mandating that three of the five positions be set aside for “persons of color.” The Brock Amendment, instead, said that panel candidates would be chosen, “based on a wide array of qualifications, reflect(ing) a variety of backgrounds, skills, experiences, and perspectives, (while) be(ing) racially diverse, and represent(ing) geographically diverse areas of the State.”
.
Those voting YES believe that creating a government panel with racial quotas sets a bad precedent for rooting out racial discrimination, and is, in fact, an example of systematic racism. A quota system would eliminate many qualified candidates with pertinent experiences and good character, before they would even be considered for these positions.
.
Those voting NO believe that setting a quota to ensure a majority “persons of color” majority on the Panel is necessary to ensure that those who have experienced racial discrimination firsthand hold a majority of representation on the Panel.
.
Senate Journal, Wednesday, March 21, 2018. “Which was disagreed to, on a roll call, Yeas 12, Nays 18.” (Read the Journal, p. 486-493)
.


How They Voted

(Click on Your Senator’s Name to Send an Email)

Timothy Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) – NO
Claire Ayer (D-Addison) – NO
Becca Balint (D-Windham) – NO
Philip Baruth (D-Chittenden) –  NO
Joseph Benning (R-Caledonia) – YES
Carolyn Branagan (R-Franklin) – YES
Christopher Bray (D-Addison) –  NO
Randy Brock (R-Franklin) – YES
Francis Brooks (D-Washington) – YES
Brian Campion (D-Bennington) – NO
Alison Clarkson (D-Windsor) – NO
Brian Collamore (R-Rutland) – NO
Ann Cummings (D-Washington) –  YES
Margaret Flory (R-Rutland) – YES
Debbie Ingram (D-Chittendent) – NO
M. Jane Kitchel (D-Caledonia) – NO
Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden) – NO
Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) – YES
Richard Mazza (D-Chittenden-Grand Isle) – YES
Richard McCormack (D-Windsor) –  NO
Alice Nitka (D-Windsor District) – YES
Chris Pearson (P-Chittenden) –  NO
Anthony Pollina (P/D/W-Washington) – NO
John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) – NO
Richard Sears (D-Bennington) –  NO
Michael Sirotkin (D-Chittenden) –  NO
David Soucy (R-Rutland) – YES
Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) – YES
Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) –  YES
Jeanette White (D-Windham) –  NO

Not yet signed up?

Join the EAI email list today.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

The Dairy Crisis

September 21, 2018 by John McClaughry New England dairy farmers are suffering from chronically low milk prices that threaten to drive many more out of business.  Part of...

Senior Citizens Would Get Hit Hardest by a $15 Minimum Wage

by Rob Roper The $15 minimum wage is an increasingly hot topic in the election debates. Proponents have faith that artificially increasing the cost of labor will be...

EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households

For Immediate Release September 18, 2018 Contacts: Rob Roper, rob@ethanallen.org David Flemming, david@ethanallen.org EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households To Read EAI’s...

Foolish Government

September 18, 2018 by John McClaughry Here’s a small news item from the Roseburg (Oregon) Beacon which illustrates how dimwitted government can cause enormous damage. A man driving...

A Bold Claim: The ESSEX Carbon Tax Is “Conservative”?

By David Flemming If you happened to be reading the ESSEX Plan Carbon Tax for the first time, you might ask yourself, “why did they choose $40 per...

Video