Roll Call! Senate Bans Firearm Sales to Persons Under 21, (21-9)

Roll Call Graphic
PASSED
in the State Senate on March 2, 2018 by a vote of
 
21-9 

.
Purpose: To ban the sale of firearms to persons under the age of 21.
.
Analysis: This amendment makes it a crime to sell a firearm to a person under 21 years of age. Doing so carries a penalty of not more than one year in jail, not more than a $1,000 fine, or both. Exceptions are made for a law enforcement officers, members of the National Guard, and of the U.S. Armed Forces purchasing firearms for purposes their official duties.
.
Those voting YES are in favor of raising the age to purchase a firearm to 21.
.
Those voting NO sought to keep the age requirement at 18, noting that people who are old enough to vote and to serve in the military and in law enforcement with high levels of firearms training would be prohibited from purchasing a hunting or sporting rifle under this law.
.
Senate Journal, Friday, March 2, 2018. “Thereupon, pending third reading of the bill, Senators Ashe, Balint, Ayer, Baruth, Bray, Brooks, Campion, Clarkson, Cummings, Ingram, Lyons, McCormack, Pearson, Pollina, Sirotkin and White moved to amend the bill… Which was agreed to on a roll call, Yeas 21, Nays 9.” (Read the Journal, p. 344-347)
.


How They Voted

(Click on Your Senator’s Name to Send an Email)

Timothy Ashe (D/P-Chittenden) – YES
Claire Ayer (D-Addison) –  YES
Becca Balint (D-Windham) – YES
Philip Baruth (D-Chittenden) –  YES
Joseph Benning (R-Caledonia) – NO
Carolyn Branagan (R-Franklin) – NO
Christopher Bray (D-Addison) –  YES
Randy Brock (R-Franklin) – NO
Francis Brooks (D-Washington) – YES
Brian Campion (D-Bennington) – YES
Alison Clarkson (D-Windsor) – YES
Brian Collamore (R-Rutland) – NO
Ann Cummings (D-Washington) –  YES
Margaret Flory (R-Rutland) – NO
Debbie Ingram (D-Chittendent) – YES
M. Jane Kitchel (D-Caledonia) – YES
Virginia Lyons (D-Chittenden) – YES
Mark MacDonald (D-Orange) – YES
Richard Mazza (D-Chittenden-Grand Isle) – YES
Richard McCormack (D-Windsor) –  YES
Alice Nitka (D-Windsor District) – NO
Chris Pearson (P-Chittenden) –  YES
Anthony Pollina (P/D/W-Washington) – YES
John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) – NO
Richard Sears (D-Bennington) –  YES
Michael Sirotkin (D-Chittenden) –  YES
David Soucy (R-Rutland) – NO
Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) – NO
Richard Westman (R-Lamoille) –  YES
Jeanette White (D-Windham) –  YES

Not yet signed up? Join the EAI email list today.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Christopher Sulzman March 6, 2018 at 10:17 pm

This is a very bad public policy vote that does nothing but take away our liberties. There is no evidence based information that this will do anything positive and I feel It was only done to appease your voter base. I will remember and use my vote in the future.”

Reply

Steven Pike March 8, 2018 at 4:10 pm

At least the Republicans were largely correct on this feel good but do nothing except discriminate against younger people bill. Westman, however, is a good progressive and stuck with the Democrats.

Reply

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Senior Citizens Would Get Hit Hardest by a $15 Minimum Wage

by Rob Roper The $15 minimum wage is an increasingly hot topic in the election debates. Proponents have faith that artificially increasing the cost of labor will be...

EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households

For Immediate Release September 18, 2018 Contacts: Rob Roper, rob@ethanallen.org David Flemming, david@ethanallen.org EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households To Read EAI’s...

Foolish Government

September 18, 2018 by John McClaughry Here’s a small news item from the Roseburg (Oregon) Beacon which illustrates how dimwitted government can cause enormous damage. A man driving...

A Bold Claim: The ESSEX Carbon Tax Is “Conservative”?

By David Flemming If you happened to be reading the ESSEX Plan Carbon Tax for the first time, you might ask yourself, “why did they choose $40 per...

Hallquist’s “Free Tuition” Not Free for Property Taxpayers

by Rob Roper Democratic gubernatorial candidate Christine Hallquist recently announced her plan to offer “free” college education for low income Vermont students. Only, the plan is not free...

Video