Minimum Wage Challenge: Don’t Forget the Benefits!

March 26, 2018

by Rob Roper

As the Vermont legislature debates raising the state minimum wage to $15 an hour, a handful of lawmakers is taking what’s being called the minimum wage challenge. The idea is to live on what a minimum wage earner makes in a week, which, according to the rules put out by Rights & Democracy, is:

Take home income (after avg. housing & taxes subtracted) – Add 1 of the 4 below into your budget line based on your life circumstances*
     1 — Married person living alone – $161.00
     2 — Married person sharing housing cost w/spouse – $274.50
     3 — Single person living alone- $147.00
     4 — Single person sharing housing cost w/partner or roommate – $260.50

While trying to understand the real challenges of making ends meet on limited income is a worthwhile endeavor (suggest reading Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich), this game misses the mark.

According to the Vermont Paycheck Calculator, the take home pay of someone earning $10.50 an hour for a 40 hour week is $374 after taxes. Those game figures of $147 to $275 reflect a reduction in housing costs of what my back-of-the-napkin calculation appears to be $850 a month. Fair enough. But what it does not reflect is the benefits someone earning $20,800 per year (minimum wage/40 hours per week) collects in Vermont.

As the chart below illustrates, a single parent earning minimum wage has access to resources of roughly $45,000 a year, including benefits such as state and federal earned income tax credits, food stamps (3 Squares), and childcare subsidies. This is an amount roughly equivalent to the after-tax resources of someone who earns a salary of $52,000 a year. Legislators need to explain why it is fair for someone earning $50,000 a year to be forced to subsidize through taxes the higher standard of living, at least in terms of access to resources, of someone earning $25,000. Significantly higher when you subtract childcare costs from the $50,000 earner’s after tax income, which is not reflected in this chart.

Benefits Cliff Chart

Also looking at the chart you will see that someone earning $32,500, about what someone earning $15 an hour would make in a year, is starting to slide over the “benefits cliff”: the point where added income equals a reduction in overall access to resources. The worker who gets a wage bump from $15 to $18 or $19 an hour as a result of the minimum wage increase is really screwed!

This “benefits cliff” is what causes some workers to refuse promotion or increased salary for fear of loss of benefits. But, in doing so, folks that make this decision are relegating themselves to being part of a permanent underclass. Barring a lottery win, choosing benefits over income means poverty forever.

This dynamic is the “wage challenge” our legislators should be looking to fix.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Doug Ricnmond March 31, 2018 at 2:19 am

Working as I did with hundreds of small businesses, I heard MANY stories of a new employee determinted to get his family off welfare. Works hard, gets raises. Eventually he loses one welfare beniefit after another. Finally he can’t get that subsidized 4 bedroom apt. Makes ‘too much money’. Forced to quit by the system.

Heard that for 25 years.

Reply

Allan Morrie March 31, 2018 at 7:49 pm

When the minimum wage is increased over the next few yars, I doubt that the businesses will increase the wages of their employees.
I work for a multi billion corporation, and the factory that I work at clears 43 million per year. We are not paid much more than $15.50 per hour. So I’m wondering how the minimum wage increase is going to benefit those of us that already mach just over $15 per hour?
The corporations work their employees to the maximum and pay the least amount that they can get away with. Te employees are afraid to unionize for fear of being fired.
The company that I work for can afford to pay their employees twice as much as they do now.
In the 1950’s and1960’s, a family could be supported by one income, and the spouse could stay home and raise their childen to be responsible citizens.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Climate Action Eclipsed by Covid-19 for #1 Priority in Legislature

April 3, 2020 By David Flemming Yesterday, Vermont’s Senate Health & Welfare committee and Senate Education committee held a joint hearing on Youtube, with two employees from the...

COVID-19 Impact on Property Taxes Not Clear – but Big

April 2, 2020 By Rob Roper The legislature is supposed to set the “yield” rate for Vermonters’ property taxes, but the economic chaos set off by the COVID-19...

National Geographic dreams

April 1, 2020 by John McClaughry National Geographic magazine, justly famous for taking its readers to every part of the globe with spectacular photography, has long been an...

Roll Call! Senate Gives Most Future Convicts Right to Parole (21-9), 2020

H.261- AN ACT RELATING TO LIMITING THE SENTENCE OF LIFE WITHOUT POSSIBILITY OF PAROLE PASSEDin the State Senate on March 11, 2020, by a vote of 21-9 Purpose: To give...

What about “If it costs one life”?

by Rob Roper New York governor Andrew Cuomo recently said of the economic shutdown in his state, and presumably everywhere, “if it saves one life” it’s all worth...

Video