Kavanaugh and executive power

September 5, 2018

by John McClaughry

The Senate Judiciary committee’s hearing opened this week on the nomination of Judge Brett Kavanaugh to be a Justice of the Supreme Court, and the Democrats are having a terrible time trying to find something wrong with him.

One charge against Judge Kavanaugh is that he might be too favorable to executive power, by which the Democrats mean he might rule to uphold some high handed and unconstitutional action by President Trump.

Judge Kavanaugh has a twelve year record on the DC Circuit, and it’s worth looking at how he addressed the question of executive authority.

It’s true that Judge Kavanaugh has been very critical of unaccountable bureaucrats making far reaching decisions. A case came before him about the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s decision to open the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository. Congress gave the NRC that authority, but the President opposed its decision. But the President can’t remove his predecessor’s NRC appointees except for corruption or incompetence.

Judge Kavanaugh wrote that the NRC and similar agencies “have huge policymaking and enforcement authority and greatly affect the lives and liberties of the American people, yet those independent agencies are democratically unaccountable—neither elected by the people nor supervised in their day-to-day activities by the elected President.”

Who was the President, who Judge Kavanaugh thought should have the power to decide? It wasn’t Trump or Bush, but Barack Obama.

The Democrats need to find another argument for opposing Judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation. They’re not having much luck, and I hope their luck doesn’t improve.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Robert September 5, 2018 at 6:41 pm

It’s embarrassing to watch the antics of geriatric children like Leahy as they try to derail the confirmation of a preeminently qualified juror such as Mr. Kavanaugh. The magnitude of arrogance of these democrat agitators is incalculable. Evidently they did not heed the words of their beloved Pen & Phone president when he said “Elections have consequences.” I am looking forward to celebrating Mr. Kavanaugh’s confirmation, which is going to happen no matter how high the pitch of democrat squeals.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Senior Citizens Would Get Hit Hardest by a $15 Minimum Wage

by Rob Roper The $15 minimum wage is an increasingly hot topic in the election debates. Proponents have faith that artificially increasing the cost of labor will be...

EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households

For Immediate Release September 18, 2018 Contacts: Rob Roper, rob@ethanallen.org David Flemming, david@ethanallen.org EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households To Read EAI’s...

Foolish Government

September 18, 2018 by John McClaughry Here’s a small news item from the Roseburg (Oregon) Beacon which illustrates how dimwitted government can cause enormous damage. A man driving...

A Bold Claim: The ESSEX Carbon Tax Is “Conservative”?

By David Flemming If you happened to be reading the ESSEX Plan Carbon Tax for the first time, you might ask yourself, “why did they choose $40 per...

Hallquist’s “Free Tuition” Not Free for Property Taxpayers

by Rob Roper Democratic gubernatorial candidate Christine Hallquist recently announced her plan to offer “free” college education for low income Vermont students. Only, the plan is not free...

Video