Forcing People to Pay Unions Was Theft

June 29, 2018

by Rob Roper

The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to abolish the practice of pubic-sector labor unions literally stealing money (with state government support!) from non-members was long overdue. What the Janus decision said, in a nutshell, is that the misleadingly named “fair share” practices that allowed unions to charge non-members “agency fees” is compelled speech, an abridgment of citizens’ right to freely associate, and, therefore, a violation of First Amendment rights.

Vermont was one of twenty-two states that sanctioned agency-fees that can amount to 75 percent of full union dues. The Vermont Teachers’ Union says that it charged annual agency fees of $454 to 1100 people, compared to the full union dues of $629 (BFP, 6/27/18). The Vermont State Employees’ Association (VSEA) charged 1,513 people $14.73 per pay period as opposed to $17.75 for full membership. VSEA estimates it will lose $800,000, or about a quarter of the its $3.5 million budget, as a result of the decision (VPR, 6/27/18).

Union advocates argue that the work they do collectively bargaining on behalf of their members benefits all workers, regardless of union status. As such, they feel entitled to take by force money from those they deem to be “free riders” – the workers who don’t want to, for whatever reason, voluntarily join the union. But this is not an accurate description of what was happening.

Unions are not forced to bargain on behalf of non-members, they demand the right to do so. This creates for them a monopoly, which they covet. As such, you will not see pro-union legislators in the next session offering up counter-Janus measures kicking the free riders out from under the collective bargaining umbrella if they still refuse to join up.

Bernie Sanders and other pro-union advocates are decrying this as a blow to working people, but it’s takes some pretty twisted logic to believe leaving more money in the pockets of the people who worked to earn it is somehow bad for workers. If the product unions are providing for their members is really worth $450 a year, people will pay for it. If it’s not, they won’t.

If VSEA does end up losing $800,000 it is only because their membership does not value what they are selling. Sorry, but no sympathy here. Fix your product or go out of business, but the days of putting the government gun to somebody’s head and picking their pockets are thankfully over.

Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute. 

{ 5 comments… read them below or add one }

Robert June 30, 2018 at 1:00 am

There is little more satisfying than seeing thieves get their smackdown. And seeing the scourge of our education problems, the NEA get put in its place is gratifying as well. Thank God Hillary is not president, thank God for Neil Gorsuch, thank God Kennedy announced his retirement now. Trump is doing a great job, no matter what the crazies say.

Reply

William Hays July 7, 2018 at 1:55 am

Maybe the NEW (post-Kennedy) SCOTUS can rule on the blatantly unconstitutional practice of allowing ‘Public Service Employees’ to unionize. I hope they can, rapidly, strike down this socialist permission.

Reply

Deanne June 30, 2018 at 2:39 am

Well, considering the political climate in this country, I’m surprised this was actually ended, but what is truly incomprehensible to me is how it ever got through in the first place. How could anyone have thought, it was a good idea for money to be forcibly taken from those who earn it to fund something they don’t want?

Will public education and the IRS be defunded next? That would be phenomenal. Then we can work on some others like National Endowment for the Arts, . . .

See:

https://heritageaction.com/blog/issue-profile-unconstitutional-federal-agencies

and

http://www.fortfairfieldjournal.com/fte/051612.htm

for more unconstitutional federal agencies that are squandering our hard-earned money.

Reply

Lisa June 30, 2018 at 12:03 pm

The liberal thought process continues to puzzle me. Freedom to choose only applies when they say it does.

Reply

Robert July 2, 2018 at 2:51 pm

Their belief is everyone is equal, but they are more equal. Just like the pigs in Animal Farm.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Judge Kavanaugh and the Constitution

July 12, 2018 by John McClaughry President Trump has nominated Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, to serve on the Supreme Court. The President...

Brattleboro Bans Plastic Bags

July 10, 2018 By Rob Roper As of July first, it is illegal in the town of Brattleboro to give out “single use” plastic bags; the flimsy, shapeless...

WalletHub Ranks Vermont 4th Worst State to Start a Business

June 9, 2018 by Rob Roper The personal finance website, WalletHub, just published an analysis of the best and worst states to start business. As the site points out, one...

Forcing People to Pay Unions Was Theft

June 29, 2018 by Rob Roper The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision to abolish the practice of pubic-sector labor unions literally stealing money (with state government support!) from non-members...

Health insurance mandate a step backward for Vermont health care

By Meg Hansen “If a mandate was the solution, we could solve homelessness by mandating everybody buy a house,” then-Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama quipped in a 2008...

Video