Farmers Cause Ice Age Postponement

September 12, 2018

by John McClaughry

Dr. Ron Bailey, the science editor at Reason.com, has an intriguing headline on his recent post: “If You Hate Ice Ages, Thank a Farmer. Chopping down forests and irrigating rice paddies boosted greenhouse gases enough to prevent the onset of a new ice age.”

Bailey reports that University of Virginia climatologist William Ruddiman concluded after studying 2.6 million years of climate cycles, that global average temperatures of our current interglacial period—the Holocene—should be dropping, and glaciers should now be growing in northern Canada and Siberia. But they’re not.

Ruddiman hypothesized that an increase in greenhouse gases that began 8,000 years ago was keeping the onset of a new ice age at bay. He calculated that atmospheric carbon dioxide levels should have fallen from their post-deglaciation peak of around 268 parts per million to around 240 ppm by 1800. Instead, pre-industrial carbon dioxide concentrations were actually around 285 ppm. What was the cause of these higher-than-normal concentrations of greenhouse gases?

Farmers: carbon dioxide sequestering forests were chopped down to grow crops, while the rotting of vegetation in rice paddies boosted global methane concentrations.

Ruddiman finds that without the increase in greenhouse gases caused by farming, current global average temperatures would likely have been about 1.3 degrees Celsius lower than they were in 1850. The Earth is now about 2.1 degrees Celsius warmer than it would otherwise have been. So thanks, farmers, for staving off the next ice age.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Robin J Chesnut-Tangerman September 16, 2018 at 1:37 pm

John, This is really grasping at straws, similar to standing in the path of Hurricane Florence and exulting that, “At least we aren’t having a drought!”
If we accept these conclusions, then human activity has contributed enough greenhouse gasses to raise temperatures 3.4˚ C. from where they would otherwise be. Considering that even a 1˚ C. change begins to disrupt growing seasons, food supplies, mating seasons, pest populations, storm intensity, wildfire frequency, and so on, your report is even more alarming.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Amazon Paid My Taxes on Prime Day

July 17, 2019 By Shayne Spence Much hubbub has been made on the Democratic presidential campaign trail about tech giant Amazon, and their now-infamous ability to pay $0...

Commentary: The EV Subsidy Train Picks Up Speed

July 16, 2019 By John McClaughry Chairman Anthony Roisman of the Public Utility Commission has made it official. Vermont is facing a “Pearl Harbor moment”. We in Vermont...

Solving the Border Crisis

July 15, 2019 By John McClaughry During May a record 144,000 people crossed into the United States along the Southern Border, seeking asylum in our country. Not surprisingly,...

Credit Agency: Show Me the People, Vermont!

July 12, 2019 By David Flemming The good news: one of the top major credit agencies applauded Vermont’s legislators for recognizing that Vermont has a population problem. The...

IPCC Hiding Truth on its Failed Models

Testimony of Prof. John R. Christy, U.S. House Committee on Science, Space & Technology 29 Mar 2017 (excerpt) John R. Christy is Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science, Alabama’s...

Video