Commentary: Eleven Things to Know about “Health Care Reform”

By John McClaughry (March, 2013)

“Eleven pointed questions and candid answers about the health insurance exchange and its planned successor, Green Mountain Care.”

Gov. Peter Shumlin signed Act 48 into law in 2011, and Act 171 in 2012. Together they promise the achievement of the longtime liberal goal of a “universal and unified health system”, that is, a government-controlled health system rationally designed, managed, and enforced by five government experts titled the Green Mountain Care Board. The governor’s target date for launching the single-payer health system is 2017.

Here are eleven questions a citizen might want answered about the approaching single payer revolution.

1.      Has Vermont sought outside expertise to create this universal system?

After the legislature spent half a million dollars on two earlier studies, the Shumlin Administration paid $300,000 to the University of Massachusetts to explain the needed amounts and mechanisms to finance Green Mountain Care, and the impacts of various tax increases on taxpayers, businesses, and the economy.

2.      So how did they recommend that Green Mountain Care be financed?

We may never know, because two months before the report’s due date (January 15, 2013) the Shumlin Administration told UMass to withhold any recommendations on how Vermont taxpayers could be made to produce the $1.6 billion a year – three times the state’s income tax collections! –  needed to make Green Mountain Care viable. Gov. Shumlin now says the public doesn’t need to know those details until, most likely, after the 2014 election.

3.      Will every Vermonter be included in this new system when implemented?

Ideally yes, but actually no. Medicare and Veterans Administration health care, plus the coverage of federal employees in Vermont, will remain under Federal control. Over 100,000 employees of larger businesses with self-insured health plans can’t be forced into Green Mountain Care, per federal law (ERISA). So the “single payer” plan will be very far from “universal”, and the vast “savings” predicted from having only one payer – state government –largely disappears.

4.      What is the Health Benefits Exchange?

The Obama Affordable Care Act of 2010 pays participating states to establish insurance exchanges where households and businesses can go to purchase government- approved coverage. Alone among the fifty states, Vermont mandates that all individuals and all businesses with 1-50 employees must buy only through the Exchange. Businesses with 51-100 employees will be mandated in by 2016. The Obama administration has paid the state of Vermont at least $126 million to create this Exchange. (This is not a misprint).

5.      What’s the incentive to purchase through the Exchange?

An approved Exchange offers Federal income tax credits to defray the expense of the premiums. Gov. Shumlin wants as many lives as possible to receive tax credits through the Exchange, so in 2017 he can get the Federal government to cash out the tax credits and write the state a big check to help finance Green Mountain Care. In fact, the state is aggressively encouraging employers to drop coverage, pay a federal penalty, and send their employees off to the Exchange, to increase the tax credit total.

6.      What if those employees don’t have enough money to pay the higher cost premiums of the policies in the Exchange, even with the Federal tax credit?

They’ll become uninsured.

7.      If the Exchange isn’t functional by October 1, and individuals and small businesses are forbidden to purchase insurance outside the Exchange, what will become of their health coverage?

When their current contracts expire, they will be uninsured, unless the administration waives the mandate requirement.

8.      What will become of the Exchange in 2017, when single payer Green Mountain Care springs to life?

Under Green Mountain Care, there will no longer be any major medical health insurance. So the Exchange will abruptly vanish – after taxpayers spent some $160 million to create and operate it for three years.

9.      How does Gov. Shumlin think the Green Mountain Care Board will solve the “cost containment” problem?

Mainly through “payment reform”.  It will replace the predominant “fee for service” medicine with some new arrangement, whereby the GMC Board pays money to a provider group that agrees to provide more efficient care. In March the GMC Board got another $45 million Federal grant to figure this out. The most familiar model to Vermonters is “managed care”, in one guise or another.

10.  Is all this believable?

Gov. Shumlin staunchly maintains that it is. But longtime single payer advocate Hamilton Davis has observed “the structural reforms that we need to get the rest of the way – payment reform and system integration – have not yet moved beyond the early planning and pilot project stage. These two initiatives sound reasonable enough, but they in fact presume a huge technical and cultural shift in the whole warp and woof of the delivery of health care, so that even 2017 will be a considerable stretch.”

11.  What will happen if this grand scheme doesn’t work?

Chaos, probably.

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

Even Massachusetts Is Giving Up on TCI!

February 27, 2020 by Rob Roper Throughout the debate over The Transportation Climate Initiative (TCI), the convoluted scheme to squeeze up to $5.6 billion out of New England...

House Passes Global Warming Solutions Act, (105-37), 2020

. H.688 – AN ACT RELATING TO ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE PASSED in the State House of Representatives on February 26, 2020, by a vote of 105-37 Purpose: The...

Roll Call! House Ducks Responsibility to Vote on Controversial CO2 Plan, (44-99), 2020

. H.688 – AN ACT RELATING TO ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE – DONAHUE AMENDMENT FAILED in the State House of Representatives on February 20, 2020, by a vote of...

Return of the Thermal Utility – a Tax on Electricity

February 24, 2020 By John McClaughry A push is on in Montpelier to create the thermal utility so long sought by VPIRG. Unlike the version of 13 years...

Amendment Would Eliminate Private Ownership of Real Estate

February 21, 2020 by Rob Roper PR.9 is a proposed amendment to the state Constitution that would essentially and in effect ban the private ownership of real estate...