Divestment of fossil fuel stocks is bad policy 



by Rob Roper



Since January Governor Peter Shumlin has been pressuring state pension fund managers and lawmakers to sell off coal and Exxon/Mobil holdings. The Governor says (now) this policy is necessary to combat climate change. If enacted, however, divestment will do virtually nothing to reduce carbon emissions — but could cost Vermont taxpayers millions. Because state pension funds are overwhelmingly “defined benefit,” meaning the payout is guaranteed regardless of how well the pensions’ investments do, it is once again the Vermont taxpayers who will be put on the hook for a worthless program that will have no impact on the environment.

Let’s look at the facts. Vermont Treasurer Beth Pearce calculated that fossil fuel divestment would cost the state pension funds approximately $10 million per year in foregone returns and $8.5 million in implementation fees. Even a less ambitious sell-off of investments would result in financial loss. Money contributed by and meant to benefit Vermont’s nearly 50,000 retirees would vanish, and taxpayers would ultimately be on the hook to make up the difference. (Keep in mind that our state pensions have already been mismanaged by Montpelier to the point where they are facing a $3.8 billion unfunded liability. Divestment just adds fuel to this fire.)

Divestment is a bad policy that politicizes what should be the non-political function of funding state pensions in the most efficient and effective way possible. It is kowtowing to a small, loud group of activists, well funded by out of state sources and pushing an agenda that has nothing to do with state workers’ retirement benefits. Most notable among this crowd is Bill McKibben of 350.org.

Governor Shumlin very recently rejected the concept of divestment. In fact, less than two years ago the governor argued that “…owning the stocks and having a seat at the table with the oil companies — is a good place to be.” Even McKibben and other divestment activists have even acknowledged the fact that divestment does nothing to directly reduce carbon emissions. So why the Governor’s flip-flop? He had it right the first time!

Fortunately Treasurer Pearce and other responsible officials have dutifully warned that handing over investment decisions to legislators and political leaders undermines the prudent process put in place by statute. It is the mission of the Vermont Pension Investment Committee (VPIC) to manage investments of the retirement systems, “with integrity, prudence, and skill to meet or exceed the financial objectives of the beneficiaries of the funds,” VPIC says. In short, it is VPIC’s sole fiduciary responsibility to protect the financial interests of Vermont’s hard working pensioners while maximizing returns and minimizing risks.

Allowing politicians to meddle with investment funds to fan the flames of unrelated political agendas is not a recipe for financial success. 
Treasurer Pearce is not alone in upholding these statutes in Vermont. In 2013 then-President Ron Liebowitz of Middlebury College firmly rejected divestment on the basis of the board’s fiduciary responsibilities. At the University of Vermont, Finance and Investment Committee Member David Daigle announced UVM’s rejection of divestment in a similar vein, saying, “Our primary responsibility is to protect the endowment and my continuing fear is that this proposal would have a significant impact on the ability to balance the risks and rewards within the endowment by cutting out a substantial portion of the economy.”

It is wrong, and costly, to violate fiduciary responsibility to pensioners, students, and Vermont’s citizens in general. It is even worse to cloak a political agenda under the guise of environmental responsibility, when it is clear that divestment will not address climate change. Vermonters deserve a real debate about the immediate and long-term environmental impacts of generating the power we need to drive our economy. Divestment, as a strategy for economic and environmental success, it’s a dead end.

- Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Jim Bulmer February 13, 2016 at 2:46 pm

If Shumlin thinks that by shedding shares of Exxon Mobil Vermont will lead the way to eliminate global warring, he’s a bigger idiot than I realized. He’s so far out of touch with reality, he can’t get out of town fast enough.

Reply

Paul Hudson February 15, 2016 at 10:16 pm

Hi Rob,
Excellent article. Divestment of my VT Retirement fund by the Investment Committee would be foolish. First, is our globe really warming beyond its normal cycles? Al Gore and his “chicken little” fans have so far corrupted this issue no one can know where the truth lies.
Second, there are 49 other US states and over 190 other nations in this World. Is VT divesting productive accounts to become “The Mouse That Roared”? I hope not.
Finally, the Investment Committee statute creates a “fiduciary relationship” for the Committee members with each of VT’s retirees. That is a sacred trust and there is no authority for this tantrum divestment. To do so exposes each Committee member voting to divest and the State to a lawsuit that might cripple the budget for years to come. Remember, many of us as retirees know the way to the way to the courthouse .
Gov. Shumlin withdraw your proposal ASAP !! It’s a very bad idea. Now go to your office and wait until you can join us as VT State retiree,
Paul F. Hudson

Reply

john December 22, 2016 at 8:08 pm

Fossil fuels are rapidly being displaced by renewables. Stop with your Jurrasic Age thinking. The Saudi oil Minister recently said ” The end of the Age Of OIl is on the horizon”
Even the Saudis are investing heavily in solar

Reply

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

House pushes for a primary seat belt law

by John McClaughry The Vermont House is off on another tear to pass a mandatory seat belt law for adults. For some years we’ve had a secondary seat...

$300,000 in NEA Donations Could Cost Taxpayers $100 Million

by Rob Roper Governor Phil Scott proposed what should be an absolute no-brainer policy change that would save Vermont property taxpayers $26 million next year and more than...

Climate Science Red Team

by John McClaughry Some years ago a national administration – possibly Reagan’s — created an independent Red Team to attack the orthodox national security policy prescriptions of its...

Statehouse Headliners 4-24-17

A Brief Overview of Last Week’s Activity Under the Golden Dome by Guy Page Marijuana H.167, amended to permit both licensed, commercial marijuana cultivation and retail sales and...

Cal-Berkeley’s Free Online Courses Go Offline

by John McClaughry  The March 20 Weekly Standard had a notable article  from Andrew Ferguson. It’s about the clash of politically correct University of California-Berkeley with the equally...

Video