Commentary: Progressive Policies Are Hurting Middle Class, Rural Vermonters (March, 2019)

By Rob RoperRob Roper

We are half way through the 2019 legislative session, and a theme is emerging. While the majority of legislators would probably insist they are looking out for our most vulnerable friends and neighbors, the flood of proposed new taxes, regulations, and curbs on traditional culture have something in common – they are almost universally hostile to low and middle income, rural, working Vermonters.

Just this week three new carbon tax proposals hit the House, all of which would make life more expensive and difficult for those who drive older cars, need larger vehicles for weather and terrain, drive further to work, and live in (and have to heat) older housing stock. An overwhelming majority of Vermonters oppose a carbon tax, yet the new legislature’s crop of Green New Dealers seems more determined than ever to pass one, if not this year then next.

The school district consolidation law, Act 46, is disproportionately punitive to rural school districts. This law, which works fine for larger, more populous regions of the state, is forcing poorly matched rural school districts to combine, disbanding their local school boards, in many cases against the democratically determined will of their electorates. Some rural communities have already lost their local schools as a result, and more expect to. Even though legislators say this wasn’t the intent of the law, they have done nothing to enforce their original intent or to fix the law.

Affordable housing is a huge issue facing our state, but the Act 250 “reforms” taken up this year will actually make housing more expensive and harder to build, not cheaper and easier. For example, a proposed requirement that all new construction be “carbon neutral,” either through adopting costly building practices and materials or by purchasing carbon offsets, will add to the already high regulatory cost of creating new homes. These costs will be passed along to the buyer/renter, raising the cost of housing.

Additionally, the legislature’s intent to herd development only into down town centers – the most expensive real estate – and to restrict it or ban it in rural areas where real estate is cheaper will also drive up housing costs and decrease incentives to build, keeping housing supplies low and prices high. The only people who will be able to afford shelter here are the very wealthy, or those poor enough and lucky enough to qualify for subsidized housing. Subsidized, of course, by middle class taxpayers, who increasingly can’t afford their own rents, mortgages and property taxes.

Following last year’s raising of the legal age to purchase a hunting rifle and ban on “high capacity” magazines, this year we are seeing more second amendment restrictions surface, including waiting periods for sales (48 hours or 72 hours) and a “safe storage” requirement. These further erode and show a lack of respect for Vermont’s rural hunting and sport shooting traditions.

Even the proposals that are ostensibly designed to help working people, such as the $15 minimum wage and Paid Family Leave will do more to hurt than to help.

A $15 minimum wage hike won’t matter as much in Chittenden County, where the market-level prevailing wage is already pushing hourly earnings to that level. However, in the rural communities, especially those along the Connecticut River that compete with New Hampshire and its $7.25 minimum wage, a $15 minimum wage in Vermont would be devastating to small marginal businesses. Many low wage Vermonters will lose their jobs entirely as a result of this mandate, others will lose hours. Those that do see a rise in income will disqualify for benefits, wiping out any financial gain. Every Vermonter will suffer the inflationary effects of higher labor costs being passed along to the consumer, especially those living on a fixed income.

The Paid Family Leave initiative would create a $100 million plus entitlement program that relies on a new payroll tax – essentially a 20% income tax increase for every already overtaxed Vermonter who earns a paycheck – for a benefit most Vermonters will never qualify to access. This encapsulates everything that is wrong with our statehouse mindset today: a massive tax Vermonters can’t afford to pay for a new entitlement the state can’t efficiently manage, and it has to be mandatory because otherwise nobody would participate of their own free will!

Take a careful look at this agenda. It’s not an agenda for the people a small, rural state struggling with high taxes, a high cost of living, a rugged climate, and not enough opportunities for upwardly mobile careers. Quite the opposite. It’s more like checking boxes on a list of ideological bumper sticker slogans from California.

— Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Allan Morrie March 1, 2019 at 11:08 pm

With all the taxes that are either being proposed or implemented, we as a state is becoming more socialistic. Our representatives are no longer representing the people! The people of Vermont want less taxes and less restrictions on our lives.
It’s time to roll back the clock to a more affordable time.
As for carbon dioxide, the plants absorb the carbon dioxide. Gasoline vehicles emit carbon monoxide. This Green Deal is just a hoax to rob people of their hard earned money and will not help the climate at all. Our air quality in Vermont is pretty damn good.

Reply

Deanne March 2, 2019 at 3:39 am

How far will it have to go in Vermont before the results and impact become unavoidable? I truly don’t understand what is behind the shenanigans in Vermont. Is there some conspiracy to try to force generational Vermonters to have to sell so someone can buy up Vermont real estate? How could any thinking person continue to implement such harmful policies? And there is a legislature nearly full of these people. Makes one wonder what is really going on. It will certainly be interesting to see how things play out.

Reply

Ellen March 4, 2019 at 5:29 pm

Socialism 101… we get to live the socialist dream right here in Vermont! Buckle up folks because Montpelier just doesn’t care and I’m betting the rides going to get rough.

Reply

Robert Tucker March 16, 2019 at 7:32 pm

This didn’t happen overnight. It creeped into our lives slowly, built momentum and snowballed to where we are now. We were made to feel guilty if we resisted and so we didn’t. We let it happen. We are now the hapless victims who sanctioned the creep of socialism. What the socialists rely on is the “sanction of the victim “. Refuse to sanction it!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Commentary: The EV Subsidy Train Picks Up Speed

July 16, 2019 By John McClaughry Chairman Anthony Roisman of the Public Utility Commission has made it official. Vermont is facing a “Pearl Harbor moment”. We in Vermont...

Solving the Border Crisis

July 15, 2019 By John McClaughry During May a record 144,000 people crossed into the United States along the Southern Border, seeking asylum in our country. Not surprisingly,...

Credit Agency: Show Me the People, Vermont!

July 12, 2019 By David Flemming The good news: one of the top major credit agencies applauded Vermont’s legislators for recognizing that Vermont has a population problem. The...

IPCC Hiding Truth on its Failed Models

Testimony of Prof. John R. Christy, U.S. House Committee on Science, Space & Technology 29 Mar 2017 (excerpt) John R. Christy is Distinguished Professor of Atmospheric Science, Alabama’s...

Tunnel vision on carbon reduction leaves Vermont vulnerable to next “climate storm”

July 10, 2019 By Guy Page July 10, 2019 – Vermont’s energy leaders often warn about the dangers of climate-change related extreme weather. But the solutions they propose...

Video