Commentary: Carbon Tax Will Hurt Towns, Schools, and Property Taxpayers (October, 2016)

by Wendy WiltonWendy Rotator Card

A carbon tax on gasoline, diesel, home heating fuel and propane will negatively impact Vermont’s already struggling economy. In just a few years from passage the impact is expected to be an additional $0.88 per gallon on gasoline, $1.02 on diesel and home heating fuel, and $0.58 per gallon of propane.

Increasing the cost of fuel will also likely increase property taxes as the state has not exempted municipalities or school districts from paying most fuel taxes. Municipalities and school districts operate vehicles and equipment such as school buses, police cars, fire trucks, plow trucks and excavators. These vehicles use significant amounts of fuel and energy costs are a large part of municipal and school budgets.

If the state carbon tax proposed last year were in fully implemented in fiscal year 2016 the City of Rutland would have budgeted about $805,000 for gasoline, diesel, fuel oil and propane, a 48% increase over the $543,000 budget. This represents $0.03 on the municipal tax rate or $45 per year tax increase for the average home. That cost would be about the same as the bond cost of a new City swimming pool.

The Rutland School district spent $106,000 on fuel oil, and $88,000 on gasoline and diesel. With the added tax these expenditures would also increase to 48% increase, the difference representing salary and benefits for approximately one classroom teacher.

If a carbon tax were imposed it would mean hard budgetary choices for towns and schools just a few years. This tax is very regressive, will be very harmful for working Vermonters, and will add more burdens through the town and school budgets.  Increasing the cost of fuel will also mean our fuel assistance programs will help fewer needy Vermonters. There is no guarantee that tax revenues collected form such a tax won’t be used to shore up the state’s budget woes.

Nationally, progressives are pushing a multistate cap and trade bill that will have similar effects. Gubernatorial candidate Sue Minter supports such a plan, whereas Phil Scott has said he will veto a carbon tax.

Wendy Wilton is treasurer of Rutland City and a member of the Ethan Allen Institute board of directors. 

{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }

Jim Bulmer November 1, 2016 at 5:14 pm

On November 8, we can put a cork in the carbon tax bottle once and for all, VOTE, VOTE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Reply

Peg C November 4, 2016 at 4:39 pm

Sounds like the underpinings of “smart growth” being brought
through a back door, but this too is for our own good as the socialists would
have us believe…..

Reply

Andrew Tarantino November 4, 2016 at 6:20 pm

Well said Wendy, Thank you! Now Sue Tax More Minter, is telling VT biz Magazine she does not support the carbon tax. a bit of Flip Flop. I wonder if she will flip or flop on her plan to tax services, like haircuts, and lawn mowing and self storage and plumbing and electric and car repair, and moving and anything else! We need Phil Scott for Vermont, he will being honesty, affordability, accountability and fairness along with something that has been missing for along time in Montpelier COMMON SENSE! Vote person not Party!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

House pushes for a primary seat belt law

by John McClaughry The Vermont House is off on another tear to pass a mandatory seat belt law for adults. For some years we’ve had a secondary seat...

$300,000 in NEA Donations Could Cost Taxpayers $100 Million

by Rob Roper Governor Phil Scott proposed what should be an absolute no-brainer policy change that would save Vermont property taxpayers $26 million next year and more than...

Climate Science Red Team

by John McClaughry Some years ago a national administration – possibly Reagan’s — created an independent Red Team to attack the orthodox national security policy prescriptions of its...

Statehouse Headliners 4-24-17

A Brief Overview of Last Week’s Activity Under the Golden Dome by Guy Page Marijuana H.167, amended to permit both licensed, commercial marijuana cultivation and retail sales and...

Cal-Berkeley’s Free Online Courses Go Offline

by John McClaughry  The March 20 Weekly Standard had a notable article  from Andrew Ferguson. It’s about the clash of politically correct University of California-Berkeley with the equally...

Video