Commentary: Another Wrong-Headed Energy Plan (July, 2015)

by John McClaughry John McClaughry

The Public Service Department is hard at work updating the state’s 2011 Comprehensive Energy Plan. This herculean task requires putting together the products of at least nine working groups and reports over the past five years, ever mindful of the 2006 mandate to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to as much as 75% below the 1990 baseline by 2050, to “lower the state’s contribution to global warming.”

The central driver of these plans is Gov. Shumlin’s 2011 decree that the state must obtain 90% of its total energy from renewable sources by 2050. This decree, incidentally, has never been voted on by elected legislators, even though every year they are asked to approve ever more legislation to achieve it.

In a submission destined to be widely ignored, the Ethan Allen Institute observed that “a state can achieve the decreed ‘90% by 2050’only if its political leaders can persuade its taxpayers and ratepayers to provide the enormous subsidies, and submit to the ever increasing mandates, that reaching that goal will require.” (Online at

“The new Plan’s vision of a state obeying the Shumlin Decree can only be achieved by heroic, costly government intervention into the energy market, over the growing protests of taxpayers and ratepayers called upon to finance the ever expanding renewable industrial complex.”

“Whether the taxpayers and ratepayers could do more good for the people and economy of this state by making their own decisions on how to spend their own money is an important question, which of course the Plan will assiduously avoid.”

In place of all the renewable energy and climate change goals, EAI recommends a Plan “to set Vermont on a path to assure safe, reliable and competitively priced energy that will make possible a strong, competitive and growing economic base, both for creation of new wealth and income for the people of the state, and for expanded tax revenues to enable the state to meet its fiscal obligations.”

EAI’s energy expert Meredith Angwin has pointed out that the Plan expects most vehicles to increasingly become electric and most home heating to rely on electric heat pumps. Where this all new electricity will come from is a mystery. To get it from “renewables” – which today provide only 16% of total energy – will require truly heroic coercive measures, unless the gap is largely filled by more power from HydroQuebec, which would have Vermont largely at its pricing mercy.

Among the 19 specific recommendations are these:

  • Repeal the requirement that Vermonters be forced to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to 50% below the 1990 baseline by 2028, or any other year.
  • Repeal the state’s “climate action plan”, inasmuch as nothing the people of Vermont can do, even at crippling economic cost, will ever have any detectable effect on any metric of “climate change” (formerly “global warming”).
  • Repeal the RESET mandate that utilities must meet a fraction of their demand with high priced renewable electricity.
  • Repeal the Standard Offer mandate that requires ratepayers to pay far above market prices to the producers of government-favored renewable electricity.
  • Abandon the idea of instituting a carbon tax – a “climate pollution tax” to its backers. Such a tax, levied on gasoline, diesel, natural gas, home heating oil and propane, would, its backers say, include a rebate of 90% of the proceeds to people and businesses burdened by the tax; the remaining 10% would finance more renewable adventures. Opening an (eventual) $700 million a year revenue source would be an irresistible temptation to legislators to solve their chronic overspending problem, not their constituents’ energy cost burdens.
  • Assess electric vehicle owners, who pay no fuel tax, a charge for using the state’s highways, instead of making gasoline and diesel fueled vehicles absorb all the costs. Require that publicly installed EV charging stations charge EV owners enough to at least cover the energy they are drawing.
  • Continue to require utilities to purchase electricity offered through net metering connections, up to the point that grid stability becomes a problem; but set the rate of credit for net metering customers so that they pay their share of the fixed costs of maintaining power grid service.
  • Consistently remember that markets work, and that ordinary people usually turn out to make better use of their resources than what is prescribed for them by the experts who prepare “comprehensive energy plans.”

In short, the PSD is working hard to carry out its assignment – but in pursuit of a policy that “resolutely heads off in the wrong direction, anticipating enormous taxpayer and ratepayer costs, ever growing bureaucracies, and ever more extensive controls over the choices of the ordinary Vermonter, all to send Vermonters galloping after a wrong-headed goal of ‘90% renewable energy by 2050’”.

John McClaughry is the founder and vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

Doug Richmond, Underhill August 3, 2015 at 1:03 pm

You hear people say as they parade their all electric buggy, that They are providing the electricty for such buggy by having a solar panel. Drive all day and recharge at night, in the dark?!?! Highly $ub$idized car, and same for solar panel. $$Thousands of tax money. You can’t convince them that electricity is not something stored within the power lines. Electricity is instant or GONE. It is not a natural gas pipeline. Hot air balloons launch at dawn and dusk, because without the sun the winds are calm, which suggests that wind power is mostly daytime, also intermittent
Now GREENIE Mtn Power is ‘partnering’ with “Efficiency Vt” to sell people electric gadgets to heat their homes all winter. Free Heat out of thin air! AC yes, but heat pumps, even the good ones, can’t stand a whole Vt. Winter.
Maybe citizens should need a Certificate of Need to load up our power grid in such un-neccesary ways!?!?


Jim Bulmer August 4, 2015 at 5:10 pm

Wonderful!!!!!!!!! All these clowns will be long dead and buried by 2050 and their children and great children will have to suffer through this insanity. Mean while the “Greens” will be laughing all the way to the bank with hard earned tax payers’ money.


Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

A Response to “Who’s Really Politicizing Our Kids”

June 13, 2019 by Rob Roper The following is in response to a letter that appeared in the Caledonian Record on June 10th by Steven Isham.  To the...

VPIRG’s Plastic Agenda

June 12, 2019 By John McClaughry The plastic bag ban is sitting on Gov. Phil Scott’s desk. If he signs it, Statehouse Chronicle writer Guy Page reports, a working...

The Blittersdorf Special

June 11, 2019 By John McClaughry Remember the Champlain Flyer? That was Howard Dean’s commuter train that ran 13 miles from Charlotte to Burlington. After three years’ operation...

Roll Call! Senate Blocks Amendment to Remove Insurance Innovation from Bill (7-22), 2019

S.131 – AN ACT RELATING TO INSURANCE AND SECURITIES (BARUTH AMENDMENT) FAILED in the State Senate on April 3, 2019 by a vote of  7-22  . Purpose: The Amendment called for removing...

California Prison Drugs

June 7, 2019 By John McClaughry Steven Greenhut, writing in the Orange County (California) Register, makes an interesting point about drugs in prisons. He quotes a San Francisco...