Commentary: Absentee Ballots Undermine the Secret Ballot – And Election Integrity (December, 2018)

By Rob RoperRob Roper

The North Carolina congressional race between Republican Mark Harris and Democrat Dan McCready could be heading for a re-vote because it appears absentee ballot fraud may have influenced the outcome.

Harris is ahead by around 900 votes, but the suspicion of fraud arose from fact that he received an improbably high percentage of absentee ballot votes from one district, while in another district where Republicans statistically shouldn’t fare as well, a suspiciously high number of absentee ballots went unreturned. What this indicates is that in the former case absentee ballots were manufactured and/or manipulated, and in the latter case they were intercepted and destroyed. The courts will have to sort out these allegations.

Keep in mind the 9th Congressional District in North Carolina, with a population of 778,477, is larger than Vermont. There were 279,840 total votes cast in the tainted race. In Vermont, the total number of votes cast in our gubernatorial election was 272,972. So, this isn’t just impacting minor elections in tiny, out of the way places.

Meanwhile in New Jersey, Lizaida Camis was recently charged with bribing citizens to vote for the candidates she worked for. According to local reports, “Camis provided these voters with vote by mail applications, delivered the completed applications to the Hudson County Clerk’s office, and then went to the voters’ homes once the ballots were mailed to them. In some cases, she told them how to vote.” She secured the deal by offering them $50.

This is similar in style to an infamous case of vote fraud in 2004 from Appalachia, Virginia, in which the mayor and over a dozen coconspirators bribed voters in a low-income housing project with alcohol, cigarettes, and even a bag of pork rinds to vote their way.

And this gets to a key point: the real victims of this sort of abuse are the poor and the vulnerable. You’re not going to get many takers by flashing a bag of pork rinds or a pack of smokes around a middle class or high-income neighborhood. But, for someone dealing with mental health issues, or an addiction, or just struggling to make ends meet, fifty bucks or a Big Mac in exchange for a vote might seem like a pretty tempting offer.

If bribery doesn’t work, there’s always intimidation. In 2014, the Mayor of Martin, Kentucky, was convicted of, according to the Department of Justice,

…intimidat[ing] poor and disabled citizens in order to gain their votes during Robinson’s 2012 campaign for re-election. For instance, members of the conspiracy directed residents of public housing to vote by absentee ballot under the supervision of Thomasine Robinson or another member of the conspiracy…. Trial testimony established that the conspirators completed absentee ballots, marking their choice of candidates, and instructing the voters to sign the pre-marked ballots…. Voters who did not comply faced eviction or the loss of priority for public housing. 

This kind of fraud could not occur when absentee voting was rare and required a legitimate excuse, and ballots were cast almost entirely in a private, secure voting booth under the supervision of election officials. Advocates for voting “reforms” that lure citizens away from safe voting sites profess to be motivated by making it easier for people to vote – a noble goal – but what they are really doing is making it easier for people to cheat by undermining the secret ballot.

Some will scoff that this kind of fraud doesn’t happen often, and the honor system works. But to buy that argument, you have to believe that politics brings out the best in people, attracts the most honest and honorable actors, and that grown adults who are willing to steal lawn signs, vilify their opponents in the meanest ways, and engage in all manner of ugliness to win elections will somehow draw the line at bullying or bribing vulnerable absentee voters even as the rules make it easier and easier to do so. Please.

The voting booth ensures the integrity of our electoral system by guaranteeing the principles of the secret ballot (every vote is cast of the voter’s free will), and “one person, one vote” (we are all equal in this process) are real and in force. If our rules make it so that election officials cannot guarantee that our voting system secures these principles, how can we have faith in our electoral process? We should not let today’s policy salesmen tempt us into throwing these ideals away in exchange for a little extra convenience once every two or four years. That’s a lot like selling your vote for a bag of pork rinds.

— Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

H. Brooke Paige December 26, 2018 at 3:52 pm


“What this indicates is that in the former case absentee ballots (may have been ?) manufactured and/or manipulated, and in the latter case they (may have been ?) intercepted and destroyed.” I do not think that the “smoking gun” has been discovered, yet, in either case.


Deanne January 2, 2019 at 1:50 am

Your second to last paragraph says a lot. Although I sometimes vote, I don’t trust this set-up at all. I am convinced it is rotten to the core.


Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

Even Massachusetts Is Giving Up on TCI!

February 27, 2020 by Rob Roper Throughout the debate over The Transportation Climate Initiative (TCI), the convoluted scheme to squeeze up to $5.6 billion out of New England...

House Passes Global Warming Solutions Act, (105-37), 2020

. H.688 – AN ACT RELATING TO ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE PASSED in the State House of Representatives on February 26, 2020, by a vote of 105-37 Purpose: The...

Roll Call! House Ducks Responsibility to Vote on Controversial CO2 Plan, (44-99), 2020

. H.688 – AN ACT RELATING TO ADDRESSING CLIMATE CHANGE – DONAHUE AMENDMENT FAILED in the State House of Representatives on February 20, 2020, by a vote of...

Return of the Thermal Utility – a Tax on Electricity

February 24, 2020 By John McClaughry A push is on in Montpelier to create the thermal utility so long sought by VPIRG. Unlike the version of 13 years...

Amendment Would Eliminate Private Ownership of Real Estate

February 21, 2020 by Rob Roper PR.9 is a proposed amendment to the state Constitution that would essentially and in effect ban the private ownership of real estate...