Climate issues fared poorly on state ballots 

November 14, 2018

by John McClaughry

The very liberal Washington Post ran a story on November 7 on the fate of climate change issues on state ballots.

Their reporters wrote that “voters across a swath of resource-rich Western states largely rejected ballot initiatives aiming to nudge the nation away from burning fossil fuels and toward harnessing renewable sources of energy.”

“Voters in Arizona, one of the nation’s most sun-soaked states, handily shot down a measure that would have accelerated its shift toward generating electricity from renewables, particularly solar. “

“Residents in oil- and gas-rich Colorado defeated a measure to sharply limit drilling on state-owned land. Environmental advocates there failed to pass a measure that would have required new wells to be at least 2,500 feet from occupied buildings and other “vulnerable areas” such as parks and irrigation canals — a distance several times that of existing regulations. It also would have allowed local governments to require even longer setbacks.”

The most closely watched carbon tax initiative was in Washington. Results from that state Friday showed that the carbon tax initiative had gone down to defeat by a 56-44 margin – compared to its 59-41 defeat two years ago. The Seattle Times assailed the initiative as “porous, lacking accountability and larded with special-interest payouts” and recommended a no vote.

Will next year’s even more liberal legislature renew its push for a carbon tax, or whatever new label they think up for it? Of course it will.

John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Deanne November 17, 2018 at 2:16 am

Yes, of course it will… That is how they get things passed. I saw it in the little town in New Hampshire where I now live. We voted down paving one of our dirt roads for years. Less than half of the 4-mile road was paved, and it was in terrible shape. It seemed to me that if they couldn’t maintain the part of the road that was already paved, how could they maintain even more? Well, they kept bringing it up for a vote over and over again, year after year, until they got what they wanted. The road got paved.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Niceties Aside, It’s an Authoritarian Police State

May 20, 2019 by Rob Roper In a recent commentary featured on Vermont Digger, Steering Clear of the Shoals of Socialism, David Moats urges his fellow leftists to...

Union Dues Developments

May 17, 2019 by John McClaughry A year ago the Supreme Court ruled that public sector labor unions could not require nonmembers to pay agency fees of usually...

Roll Call! House Increases State Minimum Wage (90-53), 2019

. S.23 – AN ACT RELATING TO INCREASING THE MINIMUM WAGE .  PASSED in the State House of Representatives on May 15, 2019, by a vote of 90-53 ....

Roll Call! House Bans “Single Use” Plastic Bags, Etc. (120-24), 2019

. S.113 – AN ACT RELATING TO THE MANAGEMENT OF SINGLE USE PRODUCTS . PASSED in the State House of Representatives on May 9, 2019, by a vote...

Green Reality: Ripping Off the Poor to Subsidize the Rich

May 17, 2019 by Rob Roper VPR is doing a terrific series on state programs titled, Did It Work?, going back to see whether or not the promises...

Video