Charles Murray’s Moderate to Liberal Middlebury Speech

by Rob Roper

Charles Murray’s aborted presentation at Middlebury College where he was violently chased from the stage has garnered much national attention. It has become the poster event for liberal intolerance on college campuses and opened up a wide dialogue on how educational institutions, indeed all of us, should deal with controversial points of view.

But two Cornell professors took an interesting approach to the issue in a study, which they discuss in an New York Times article, Charles Murray’s ‘Provocative’ Talk. In their study, Wendy Williams and Stephen Ceci sent transcripts of the speech Murray gave to a diverse but mostly liberal group of 70 college professors – without identifying Murray as the author – and asked them to rank how partisan and controversial the content was on a scale of 1-9, liberal to conservative. 57 responded and gave Murray’s work an average score of 5.05, or “middle of the road.”

Some professors said that they judged the speech to be liberal or left-leaning because it addressed issues like poverty and incarceration, or because it discussed social change in terms of economic forces rather than morality.

The professors did similar surveys with different populations, and even when Murray was identified as the author the speech received similar results. They concluded:

Our data-gathering exercise suggests that Mr. Murray’s speech was neither offensive nor even particularly conservative. It is not obvious, to put it mildly, that Middlebury students and faculty had a moral obligation to prevent Mr. Murray from airing these views in public.

What this demonstrates is that people on the Left and on the Right really share many if not most common goals and interests, and that this sort of blind opposition is fueled not by intellectual disagreement, but blind hatred. Hatred that is totally unwarranted, unnecessary, and unproductive.

Murray’s book, Coming Apart, is really a plea and a plan for how we can come back together in the face of social and economic challenges. It’s a shame the folks at Middlebury refused to listen. They may have learned something not only about the issues of cultural and economic fragmentation, but also about the character and humanity of the people with whom they disagree. Good lessons both.

- Rob Roper is president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Bob Bracken May 15, 2017 at 3:36 pm

Thank you for this opportunity to comment.

I am a Canadian who tends to see himself as quite liberal in political and social views – especially when compared to the whacko, right wing neo fascism which passes for political ideology in the US Republican Party. I must say that, as I get older, I have become somewhat more reactionary, but I voted liberal in the last Canadian election.

I also happen to be the father of 2 Middlebury College students – a son who has graduated in Physics 2016, and a daughter who is still there as a Physics major (2019).
I find the College to be almost unbearable PC, with a Salem Ma ethos of rooting out what they refer to as personal and institutional intolerance as well as anything that they believe smacks of “cultural mis-appropriation” ( disbanded the origami Club) They actually have a 1st year mandatory course which is an indoctrination into this PC mindset & culture. As a result, I am not surprised by what happened with Charles Murray. Universities & Colleges, which are supposed to be facilitators of education, enlightenment and dialogue are some of the most vicious and relentless suppressors of free speech and ideas on the planet. George Orwell would feel right at home there. This is all particularly true within the smug, entitled and affluent (largely) white student body and faculty at Middlebury and the community of Liberal Arts institutions that share the New England landscape. I believe it springs from a combination of the latent guilt carried by upper middle class white Americans, expressed within the general “Us vs Them” climate of all American politics and social philosophy, and observance of the trappings of PC, and “correct” liberal thoughtandattitudes allows these people to absolve themselves of any real accountability or action to remedy or change the American reality of privilege and class structure.

Thanks for the opportunity to rant!

Bob Bracken

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

William Galston on Sanders’ single payer

by John McClaughry William Galston, a White House advisor in the Clinton years, is the thoughtful moderate Democrat columnist for the Wall Street Journal. He had a piece...

Sanderscare: What is Bernie Thinking?

by David Flemming Once again, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders has decided to beat the drum for single-payer healthcare (Medicare for All!) Will he ever realize he’s beating a...

Mathis Forgets G.I. Bill Was A Voucher Program

by Bruce Buxton This piece is a response to an Op-Ed by William Mathis of the Vermont State School Board, which can be read HERE.  Mr. Mathis is...

Are We Paying Parents to Keep Kids In Poverty?

by Rob Roper An article in Seven Days reminded us that back in 2007 the Vermont legislature set a goal to cut child poverty in half in ten...

Advocate: Raise Minimum Wage Till It Hurts!

by David Flemming On Sept. 6, David Cooper of the Economic Policy Institute (a Left leaning, Washington-based think tank founded by a coalition of eight labor unions) testified...

Video