Border County Senators Dissent on $15 Minimum Wage

March 6, 2018

by David Flemming

An overwhelming 17 out of 20 Democrat and Progressive Senators (85%) voted for a Vermont state minimum wage of $15 per hour. While raising the minimum wage might seem like a natural Democratic/Progressive thing to do, some Democrats were far more likely to buck their party – notably, those that represent counties along the New Hampshire border.

14 of 15 Democratic Senators representing Vermont’s non-New-Hampshire boarder counties voted in favor of the $15 minimum wage. However, of the 5 Democratic Senators in counties along the New Hampshire border, only 3 voted in favor. During the minimum wage discussion over the first half of the legislative session, economists and representatives agreed that NH will likely keep its minimum wage at $7.25 regardless of whether VT adopts a $15/hour minimum wage. We can’t know for certain what factors convinced John Rodgers (D-Essex-Orleans) and Robert Starr (D-Essex-Orleans) to vote against raising the minimum wage, but I’d be willing to bet that the massive wage gap that would exist between their constituencies and the New Hampshire factored into the decision.

While businesses and workers all across Vermont will be harmed if the $15 minimum wage mandate passes, the repercussions in border counties will be much more severe. Grocery stores operating in New Hampshire with the flexibility to pay new workers $7.25 will have an unprecedented competitive advantage over Vermont grocery stores that have to pay new workers $15/hour. This will force Vermont border businesses to make some tough decisions. And, if workers cannot generate $15 worth of value in their Vermont jobs, our lawmakers may be inadvertently forcing them to commute to New Hampshire to find employment.

Does this mean Vermont’s non-border Senators made the right decision in voting so overwhelmingly in favor of a higher minimum wage? Not necessarily. The dynamics of supply and demand for labor in the non-border counties contain their own peculiarities. Vermont non-border businesses that sell high-volume essentials like groceries and gas would find themselves competing against businesses that also have the higher cost of labor imposed on them. Some of these businesses may have to shut down if they were making low profits before the $15 minimum wage kicked in, but they wouldn’t face the same competitive pressure as Vermont businesses set against New Hampshire border businesses.

That being said, workers making below $15/hour in non-border counties could find themselves in a more difficult situation than workers in border counties. For them, the option of “living close to friends and family in VT and working in NH” is not really an option. They would have to uproot their lives in order to make the move. Or they could settle for an unemployment check every month.

Creating a one-size-fits-all wage for businesses and workers just getting into the workforce is akin forcing a group of people to all wear the same shoe size regardless of the size of their feet. For border businesses that have to cut back on hiring, but can remain in business, the minimum wage is indicative of a shoe that is painful to wear but better than nothing. For the young, less skilled workers who are unable to escape to NH, the $15 minimum wage becomes a jest akin to the government telling a worker they are better off wearing size 7 shoes for their size 10 feet. It is needlessly harsh and ridiculous on its face.

David Flemming is a policy analyst for the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }

William Hays March 10, 2018 at 4:24 am

Vote Democrat-Progressive-Socialist and this is what you get.

Reply

Paul Decelles March 10, 2018 at 7:44 pm

This is more “feel good” legislation for the Dem – Progs. I live and own a business in Orleans County (represented by Senators John Rodgers and Robert Starr). I know them both. There Democratic “no” votes weren’t based on the geography of the counties they represent (Orleans and Essex).

I think that the reason they voted against the minimum wage foolishness, is that unlike many of their Senate colleagues, Rodgers and Starr own and operate businesses. They have signed the front of paychecks, not just the back! They understand fully the devastating impact of forcing the small businesses in Orleans and Essex County (which are almost all businesses, here) to an unaffordable minimum wage.

Businesses that can afford technology to replace the worker will implement it. Many others, with thin operating margins already, will close. And those that remain open, will be forced to raise the prices for the goods and services they provide, passing on the costs to their customers — many of whom, sadly, think that a $15 minimum wage is a great idea.

Will the last clear thinking Vermont Senator please remember to turn out the lights, when they complete the economic ruin of our state?

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Senior Citizens Would Get Hit Hardest by a $15 Minimum Wage

by Rob Roper The $15 minimum wage is an increasingly hot topic in the election debates. Proponents have faith that artificially increasing the cost of labor will be...

EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households

For Immediate Release September 18, 2018 Contacts: Rob Roper, rob@ethanallen.org David Flemming, david@ethanallen.org EAI Releases Study of How the ESSEX Carbon Tax Would Impact VT Households To Read EAI’s...

Foolish Government

September 18, 2018 by John McClaughry Here’s a small news item from the Roseburg (Oregon) Beacon which illustrates how dimwitted government can cause enormous damage. A man driving...

A Bold Claim: The ESSEX Carbon Tax Is “Conservative”?

By David Flemming If you happened to be reading the ESSEX Plan Carbon Tax for the first time, you might ask yourself, “why did they choose $40 per...

Hallquist’s “Free Tuition” Not Free for Property Taxpayers

by Rob Roper Democratic gubernatorial candidate Christine Hallquist recently announced her plan to offer “free” college education for low income Vermont students. Only, the plan is not free...

Video