Automation and Jobs

by John McClaughry

Two weeks ago Robert Samuelson, my favorite economic columnist for the Washington Post, wrote a column entitled “Why robots won’t steal all our jobs.”

Says Samuelson, “The robots won’t destroy all our jobs. History suggests just the opposite — that new technologies inspire new jobs. So concludes a study from leading labor economists. It’s a useful antidote to widespread fears that robots and “artificial intelligence” will displace millions of workers and lead to permanently high joblessness.

“The new study doesn’t deny that jobs will be lost. But that’s not the end of the story, say David Autor, a well-known labor economist at MIT Anna Salomons of Utrecht University. Jobs have been lost before to new technologies, but these same technologies also create productivity increases — efficiency gains — that usually generate more jobs than were initially lost.”

“Autor and Salomons focused on 19 advanced nations from 1970 to 2007. Generally, employment declines initially triggered by productivity gains were later offset by larger job increases…Every 10 percent gain in productivity resulted in a 2 percent gain in employment spread over four years. This was an important contribution to job growth, though the largest employment gain came from old-fashioned population increases.”

“The main takeaway is this: Trying to save jobs by protecting old jobs from new technologies and other productivity-enhancing changes is self-defeating; employment may benefit temporarily, but the diffuse process of creating jobs and raising living standards will be frustrated.”

- John McClaughry is vice president of the Ethan Allen Institute.

{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }

Mark Shepard July 28, 2017 at 9:53 pm

One major outcome from automation is that as it increases productivity it lowers costs, thus making products affordable to more and more people. With more people able to buy the product, production of the product increases to meet the demand and results in new jobs to fill the need. This need is not just in the production sector, but also in the sectors before and after production that interact with the product: marketing, sales, installation, service, etc. Then all those people like to eat and enjoy other aspects of life with what they are earning. The net result is a higher standard of living more many many people.

For full disclosure, I have owned and operated an automation controls business since I started it in 1993. So I certainly gain personally from automation, but you would be hard pressed to find an American who has not personally benefited from automation. For example, automation is why almost everyone can own a car that actually runs most of the time.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Tax Plan, Schmax Plan: It’s The Spending, Stupid

by Chris Campion The GOP has recently been working on tax reform, and both the House and Senate have versions of tax reform that are currently being hashed...

Renewable Policies Responsible for GMP’s $80 million rate increase

by Guy Page Green Mountain Power’s proposed 2018 5% rate increase will cost ratepayers $80 million, Vermontbiz.com said November 27. GMP spokesperson Kristen Carlson blames the hike on increased transmission, regional...

Exxon Mobil ‘s “Green Preening”

by John McClaughry Here’s a news item some will find surprising. The American Legislative Exchange Council is a conservative business-oriented association of legislators and corporation interests. Recently it...

New Hampshire Lowers Taxes, Raises Revenue

by Rob Roper The New Hampshire Union Leader recently posted an editorial about their legislature’s 2015 decision to cut taxes on New Hampshire businesses. The tax cuts are...

Survey: Do You Support the ESSEX Carbon Tax Proposal

TAKE THE SURVEY! Do you support the new “ESSEX” Carbon Tax proposal? This would ultimately be a $240 million tax on gasoline (32¢/gal), heating oil and diesel fuel...

Video