12-6-13 – Vilaseca’s Public/Independent School Report “Less than Legitimate”

Montpelier – At the close of the 2013 session, the legislature established a summer study committee to, Summer Study Video“research and consider both the opportunities and challenges created by closing a public school with the intention or result of reopening it as an approved independent school….” This was in the wake of North Bennington deciding to do exactly that for the fall of 2013. The Mountain School at Winhall took the same action fifteen years ago, and now other towns are exploring the idea.

The summer study committee contained several members from Vermont’s vibrant and diverse independent school community, and took testimony from others. These educators shared some passionate stories and compelling data about the opportunities independent schools offer students, families and local communities. All of them were disregarded entirely by the Secretary of Education, Armando Vilaseca, who ended up writing the report to the legislature himself without including or referencing any of the input provided proponents of the independent school model.

Stephan Morse, chairman of the State Board of Education said in all his legislative experience (he served as Speaker of the Vermont House) he had “never seen anything like this.” (See Video)

Seth Bongartz, chairman of the board at Burr & Burton Academy was “appalled” by Vilaseca’s decision and charged that the secretary’s actions made the whole report “less than legitimate.” (See Video)

The resulting report (due for publication on or before December 15, but EAI received an early copy) is a one-sided assault on Vermont’s Independent school system. If the recommendations in this report are acted upon by the legislature, the damage to Vermont’s independent schools would be catastrophic and irreparable.

But, of course, that’s the point.

Vilaseca’s recommendations include:

1. Forbid privatization of a public school. This will require state legislation.

2. Require independent schools that accept publicly funded tuition students to offer free and reduced lunch. This would require legislation.

3. Recommend repealing statutory provisions that allow the electorate to approve payments of higher tuition rates to approved independent schools by amending Title 16 § 823(b) and 824(c).

4. Recommend amending Title 16 § 828 so that public tuition paid to privatized schools that have publicly funded enrolements of 25 percent or more is paid only to those privatized schools that:

a. provide all services public schools are required to provide.

b. meet all federal guidelines public schools are required to meet. [Vilseca provides three pages, 8-11, of such regulations, including compliance with FERPA, 1973 legislation barring discrimination based on disability, Title IX, the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Educational Opportunities Act of 1974, and the Americans with Disabilities Act.]

c. have an action plan for a “safe” environment and school crisis planning, and;

d. participate in USDOE Adequate Yearly Progress determinations.

5. Amend State Board Rule to delineate between independent schools that serve the general population vs. schools designated to serve a specific population (ie. special education disability category or other specialty such as training for athletic competition.)

6. Amend State Board Rule to require that independent schools which are accepting publicly funded students for general education are approved for all special education disability categories, even if they do not currently have enrolled students in each category.

— Rob Roper, president of the Ethan Allen Institute

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Bruce Buxton December 6, 2013 at 7:22 pm

These recommendations are a fair reflection of the imagination we have come to expect from the Agency. You would think that after 40 years of mediocre results they would want to try something else. Of course something else might risk the pensions of those who work far from the actual classrooms….


Mary Daly December 6, 2013 at 9:03 pm

What more could we expect? Where was the rest of the committee and why didn’t they refuse to sanction the onesided report?


paul hudson December 6, 2013 at 9:25 pm

In the text for the video, check the way you spelled “appauled.” I’m flattered by the spelling, but it is wrong.Thanks for Steve Morse’s insights. He was Speaker of the House when bi-partisanism was not a bad word.
Paul Hudson


James B Hall December 7, 2013 at 12:02 pm

Are we going to wait until Vermont becomes a satellite of Detroit? We are well on the way to that description, totalling up the obligations is scary as hell.

These people that think there is an endless supply of money and have the mindset that someone else is going to pay the bill, without accountability to anyone, need to be shown the door. That process needs to start at the local, and then the state level; today would be none too soon.


Leave a Comment

{ 1 trackback }

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.

Latest News

Hold Your Horses

by Chris Campion Dustin Degree, former member of the Vermont Senate, and now member of the Scott administration as executive director of workforce expansion, recently posted on Facebook some...

Look for the GMO Label!

August 14, 2018 by Rob Roper A UVM study by economist Jane Kolodinsky came to a surprising conclusion about labeling GMO foods, a policy the Vermont left pushed...

Debate Reveals Support for Carbon Tax

By Rob Roper During a debate on VPR between the four Democratic candidates who will appear on that party’s August 14th primary ballot, all stated support for placing...

Today’s Media is Opposed to a Free Press

August 7, 2018 by Rob Roper One thing that (sadly) needs to be pointed out these days is that our right to “freedom of the press” does not...

Vermont Off Track for Greenhouse Gas Goal! So what?

July 31, 2018 by Rob Roper Vermont Business Magazine reports that “Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions estimates in Vermont continued to rise for calendar year 2015, increasing from 9.45 million...