11-24-13- Ensuring a Surfeit of Superfluous Insurance

by Chris Campion

The Shumlin administration, basking in the glory of making one-third of the working

This will only hurt a little bit.

The reason? Shumlin, and his website.  From the Freeps:

Gov. Peter Shumlin and the two insurance companies that cover small employers in Vermont agreed two weeks ago to offer three-month extensions to small employers and to individualsbecause of technical troubles that have plagued Vermont Health Connect since its Oct. 1 launch. The extension and the automatic enrollment options were safety nets intended to make sure no one ended up without insurance because of the troubled website.

Oh, so that’s the reason why the extension was offered – the kind, gentle hand of government, extending a safety net. Considering that these employees already had insurance, it now looks like the results of the website’s implementation was to take away existing insurance, and a fix must be put in (via the extension) to make sure the Vermonters Shumlin told us he was trying to help can actually keep their existing insurance until his much better, and Shumlin-sanctioned, single-payer Vermont Healthier Than Most Connect With Intermittent and More Expensive Service decides to finally come online.

Well. That was nice of him.

Let’s do a little math here, since the Shumlin administration seems incapable of doing it themselves (from the Freeps article):

As of Friday, 17,775 applications had been set up on Vermont Health Connect, and 6,454 had been completed to the stage of plan selection. The final step — still unavailable online — is payment.

Well, hey – payment, schmament. The state will be seeing your income tax filings, too, so I can guarantee that payments will be made, one way or the other.  It’s most likely that payments will eventually be made through payroll tax deductions, at some point, so the state is guaranteed the income stream to make the payments to the insurers. It’s all value-added work at The People’s Healthcare Bureau.  You, the taxpayer, pays the state to take money out of your earnings so they can pay the insurers that they have routinely demonized that provide you with the insurance the politicians say you have a right to.

Got all that?  You still have rights, except for the one about keeping what you’ve earned.

About 100,000 Vermonters — small employers and their workers, plus people who have been buying their own insurance — are required by state law to use the new online marketplace to purchase medical coverage in 2014.

In short, less than 18% of those required to enroll have actually had accounts set up on Vermont Health Connect. Even better – only one third of these applicants have actually enrolled in a specific insurance program. The actual enrollment rate in the program is 6.5%.

What this latest news over an extension is truly about is the fact that no one’s signing up for Shumlin’s dearly beloved single-payer vehicle. If it walks and talks like a duck, Shumlin’s trying to sell you something.

But why do we need single-payer in the first place, if, even with the state’s website going down in flames, almost half of small employers are buying their insurance directly with Blue Cross?

Kevin Goddard, vice president for external affairs at Blue Cross Blue Shield of Vermont, offered some preliminary data. About 800 of 2,800 small employers had notified Blue Cross about their plans for next year. The breakdown:

• 40 percent chose the new option of enrolling in one of the Blue Cross plans sold on Vermont Health Connect — but were selecting and buying directly with Blue Cross.

So We'll Need Insurance To Protect Us From The Fallout Of Signing Up For Insurance?

So health care costs will go down by spending hundreds of millions of tax dollars on a website to enroll in a program that you don’t need the website to enroll in? Do I have that right, or did something large just fall on my head?

It’s pretty clear that when the mechanics of enrollment and payment are worked out, the only value for the entire project has to be the centralization of health care under a political regime, not something done to actually a) cover more people, or b) reduce costs, because neither of those things is possible by instituting a plan like Shumlin’s that is designed, purposefully, to do neither.

 

Reprinted with author’s permission from http://dangerwaffles.wordpress.com

{ 0 comments… add one now }

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post:

About Us

The Ethan Allen Institute is Vermont’s free-market public policy research and education organization. Founded in 1993, we are one of fifty-plus similar but independent state-level, public policy organizations around the country which exchange ideas and information through the State Policy Network.
Read more...

Latest News

Left-Wing Logic: Economic Freedom for Me, but Not for Thee

January 27, 2019 by Rob Roper The left-wing blog Daily Kos ran a funny/not funny article on California’s new law, AB5, passed to ostensibly “protect” people from the...

The Global Warming Solutions Act: “Dictatorships are really efficient!”

January 23, 2020 by Rob Roper Debate over the Global Warming Solutions Act in the House Energy & Technology Committee grew philosophical about whether or not democracy is...

School Choice Results

January 22, 2020 By John McClaughry Parental choice in education has been an important issue for the past two decades. Where choice programs have been in effect, first...

Vermont Gets First Look at Radical Climate Legislation, the “GWSA”

January 21, 2020 By David Flemming A radical new bill, the Global Warming Solutions Act (GWSA), was proposed a few days ago. It would turn Vermont’s greenhouse gas...

Climate Redistribution from Vermonters to Billionaires

January 16, 2020 By David Flemming At least one progressive legislator is willing to admit it: vehicle feebates are carbon taxes. Worse, he admits feebates may not even...

Video